期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术治疗鹿角形肾结石33例临床报告 被引量:8

Evaluation of Role of Peritoneoscopic Pyelolithotomy for Staghorn Calculi(Report of 33 Cases)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]评价腹腔镜手术治疗鹿角形肾结石的临床效果。[方法]2006年3月至2011年2月行腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术(包括腹腔镜肾窦内肾盂取石术)治疗鹿角形肾结石33例(A组)以及开放手术肾盂切开取石术(包括肾窦内肾盂取石术)治疗鹿角形肾结石28例(B组),比较两组患者在年龄、手术时间、术中出血、术后住院天数以及结石清除率等指标。[结果]A、B两组在年龄、手术时间、结石清除率等方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但A组在术中出血量、术后住院时间方面明显优于B组(P<0.01)。[结论]腹腔镜手术治疗鹿角形肾结石安全、可行,创伤小、出血少、恢复快,更能达到微创的效果。 [Objective]To evaluate the role of peritoneoscopic pyelolithotomy for the management of staghom calculi and its comparison with open surgery.[Methods]Between January 2006 and December 2010,we performed 33 laparoscopic pyelolithotomy(containing extended laparoscopic pyelolithotomy) and 28 open pyelolithotomy(containing extended pyelolithotomy) to treat the staghom calculi deseases.We evaluated the role of the laparoscopy in the management of staghom calculi in contrast to the open surgery by retrospectively analyzing the data of the age,total operation time, blood loss,time of postoperative hospital stay,and the clearance rate of the calculi.[Results]All the patients undergoing either peritoneoscopy(33 cases) or open surgery(28 cases) were successfully performed.Comparing the data of the laparoscopic surgery series(group A) and the open surgery series(group B),the mean age was(49.47±12.07)ages vs(45.86±12.83)ages;the mean operative time was(126.89±44.01)min vs(127.29±31.82) min,P>0.05;mean estimated blood loss was(108.89±96.44)ml vs(178.57±122.19)ml;mean time of postoperative hospital stay was(5.47±2.62)d vs (9.11±3.65)d;the stone clearance rate was 57.58-100%in group A and 61.34-100%in group B.[Conclusion]Our study shows that it is safe and feasibile for laparoscopic approach to treat the staghom calculi.This approach has the same efficiency as the traditional open approach to remove the stones,but more minimally invasive.We confirm that the laparoscopic approach can be chosen to manage those patients with staghom calculi in whom either the existing minimally invasive techniques have failed or an open operative procedure is being considered.
出处 《浙江中医药大学学报》 CAS 2011年第5期691-693,共3页 Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
关键词 肾结石 鹿角形肾结石 腹腔镜 nephrolithiasis staghorn calculi laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1B.C. Koo,N.A. Burgess,M. Rhodes.Review of laparoscopic urology[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2003 (1)
  • 2Salvado JA,Guzman S,Trucco CA.Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy:optimizing surgical technique. Journal of Endourology . 2009
  • 3Chander J,Gupta N,Lal P,et al.Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for management of renal stones. J minim Acessess Surq . 2010
  • 4Segura JW,Preminger GM,et al.Nephrolithiasis Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary Report on the Management of Staghom Calculi. Journal d Urologie . 1994
  • 5Nadu A,Schatloff O,Moraq R,et al.Laparoscopic surgery for renal stones:is it indicated in the modern endourology era?. Int Braz J Urol . 2009
  • 6DD Gaur,HM Punjani,HR Madhusudhana,SS Rathi.Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: how does it compare with percutaneous nephrolithotomy for larger stones?. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol . 2001
  • 7Gaur D D,Trivedi S.prabhudesai M R et al Retroper-itoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for staghorn stones. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A . 2002

同被引文献99

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部