期刊文献+

等离子体流动控制在乘波体前体设计中的应用

The Application of Plasma Flow Control in Airframe/Scramjet Integration Design of Waverider
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究等离子体流动控制在乘波体前体/发动机一体化设计中的应用,设计了二波系前体,首先研究不同工况下前体的性能,然后比较不同等离子体控制方法对非设计点总压恢复系数等参数的影响。研究表明,非设计点工况下前体激波不再满足激波-唇口原则,马赫数降低会使预压能力下降和流量系数减小,马赫数增大会使总压损失增大。马赫数小于设计点时,MHD方法效果较差,此时,等离子体虚拟前沿能够使减小总压损失、提高预压能力、增大空气捕获量。马赫数大于设计点时,准直流放电等离子体欧姆加热效应可减小总压损失,但会使预压能力下降和空气捕获量减小,此时MHD方法可以提高预压能力、增大空气捕获量,但会使总压损失急剧增大。 An inlet of waverider formed by two step wedge was design to investigate the application of plasma flow control on the airframe/scramjet integration design of waverider.First the performance parameters of this inlet was investigated at different condition,then the effects,such as total pressure recovery coefficient of different kinds of plasma flow control to the cases of off-design was studied.The results show that,the shock-on-lip condition can not be met at Mach numbers higher or lower the design Mach number.At Mach numbers lower than the design value,a portion of the air compressed by the shock misses the inlet and the air mass capture decreases.At Mach numbers higher than the design value,the total pressure recovery coefficient will increase.At Mach numbers lower than the design value,the effects of MHD flow control method is invalid,but the effects of virtual cowl flow control method is very well,the total pressure recovery coefficient,the compression rate and the flow coefficient of inlet will increase.At Mach numbers higher than the design value,ohmic heating flow control of quasi-DC electrical discharge will decrease total pressure recovery coefficient,but the compression rate and the flow coefficient of inlet will decrease.MHD flow control method will increase the compression rate and the flow coefficient of inlet,but the total pressure recovery coefficient will decrease sharply.
出处 《飞机设计》 2012年第5期7-12,共6页 Aircraft Design
关键词 等离子体流动控制 前体/超燃冲压发动机一体化设计 磁流体动力学 欧姆加热 plasma flow control airframe/scramjet integration design magnetohydrodynamic ohmic heating
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1郑小梅,吕浩宇,徐大军,蔡国飙.MHD加速器模式磁控进气道的优化设计[J].航空学报,2010,31(2):223-230. 被引量:10
  • 2Shneider M N,Macheret S O.Modeling Plasma and MHD Effects in Hypersonic Propulsion Flowpath,2005.
  • 3Brichkin D I,Kuranov A L,Sheikin E G.Scramjet with MHD control under"AJAX"concept physical limitations,2001.
  • 4Macheret S O,Shneider M N,Miles R B.External super-sonic flow and scramjet inlet control by MHD with elec-tron beam ionization,2001.
  • 5Shneider M N,Macheret S O,Mlies R B.Noequilibrium magnetohydrodynamic method of scramjet inlets,2002.
  • 6Mlies R B,Macheret S O,Shneider M N.Plasma enhanced hypersonic performance enabled by MHD power extraction,2005.
  • 7Shyy W,Jayaraman G,Andersson A.Modeling of glowdischarge-induced fluid dynamicsJournal of Applied Physics,2002.
  • 8Mikhail N S,Sergey O M,Richard B M.Comparatives analysis of MHD and plasma methods of scramjet inlet control,2003.
  • 9Mikhail N.Shneider,Sergey O.Macheret,Richard B.Miles,David M.VanWie.MHD Power Generation in Scramjet Engines in Conjunction with InletControl.
  • 10Roth J R.Aerodynamic flow acceleration using paraelectric and peristalticelectrohydrodynamic effects of a one atmosphere uniform glow dischargeplasmaPhysics of Plasmas,2003.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Bobashev S V, Golovachov Y P, van Wie D M. Deceleration of supersonic plasma flow by an applied magnetic field [R]. AIAA-2002- 2247, 2002.
  • 2Bobashev S V, Erofeev A V, I.apushkina T A, et al. Experiments on MHD control of attached shocks in diffuser [R]. AIAA-2003-169, 2003.
  • 3Bobashev S V, Erofeev A V, Lapushkina T A, et al. Recent results on MHD flow control at loffe institute[R]. AIAA-2006- 8012, 2006.
  • 4Kuranov A L, Sheikin E G. Magnetohydrodynamic control on hypersonic aircraft under "Ajax" concept[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2005, 40(2); 174 -182.
  • 5Sheikin E G, Kuranov A L. MHD control in hypersonic aircraft[R]. AIAA -2005-1335, 2005.
  • 6Macheret S O, Shneider M N, Miles R B. Magnetohydrodynamic control of hypersonic flows and scramjet inlets using electron beam ionization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(1): 74-81.
  • 7Shneider M N, Maeheret S O, Miles R B. Comparative analysis of MHD and plasma methods of scramjet inlet control[R]. AIAA- 2003- 170, 2003.
  • 8Shneider M N, Macheret S O, Miles R B. Analysis of Magnetohydrodynamic control of scramjet inlets [J ]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(11): 2303-2310.
  • 9Shneider M N, Macheret S O. Modeling of plasma virtual shape control of ram/seramjet inlet and isolator[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(2): 447-454.
  • 10Shneider M N, Macheret S O, Miles R B. Nonequilibrium magnetohydrodynamic montrol of scramjet inlets [R]. AIAA-2002-2251 , 2002.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部