摘要
那些以70后、80后乃至90后为命名对象的文论、论坛(会议)、选本越是"厚重"、"丰繁"、"重要",就会对其中默默耕作的个体形成越大的遮蔽。这些被遮蔽的70后个体的作品量与质都早已不是、绝不是初学者,而是已经上了几个台阶的新一代诗人,目前已进入稳定、创作成绩不断增长的状态。但他们在多种百人左右的70后诗人选本里是绝迹的,在数以百计的关于70后诗人作品研究、批评文章里是稀有乃至绝迹的。以他们的杰出,以他们对本真诗歌写作的追求,我困惑于我们当代诗歌的研究与传播现状。由此,笔者不得不怀疑我们的整个诗歌传播、诗歌批评行业的"可持续性"以及其伦理基础。
The more flourishing and important the forums,and the heavier the poetic criticism and poetry anthologies,named after the Post-70s,Post-80s and Post-90s,the more possible they will cast a shadow on the individual poets who are writing silently.From the quality and quantity of their poems,we can see that the individual poets of the Post-70s who are under the shadow of the poet groups of Post-70s are no more initial learners of poetry-writing.Instead,they are the poets of a new generation who are now in a stable creative condition of poetry-writing.In spite of their excellence and sincerity of pursuing the genuine essence of poetry,the individual poet of Post-70s are not included in many poetry anthologies which usually cover a wide range of Post-70 poets of about more than 100.Neither are these poets included in the poetry criticism about the Post-1970 poetry.Puzzled with the study and dissemination of the contemporary poetry,the author has to suspect the 'sustainability' of the poetry dissemination and criticism as well as their ethical basis.
出处
《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第5期47-51,共5页
Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词
70后诗群
诗歌传播
批评伦理
post-1970 poet group,poetry dissemination,ethical-criticism