期刊文献+

语境研究的嬗变 被引量:10

The Evolution of Context Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语境的静态研究依循原子论的思维方式 ,撇开了语境要素的动态生成和相互关联 ;语境的动态研究则贯穿整体论的思维方式 ,旨在揭示语境的人本性、建构性和互动性特征。认知语境的提出 ,从一个侧面反映了动态语境研究的深化。这种研究视角的转换 ,具有重要的方法论启示。 Static study of context is of atomistic way of thinking, and excludes the dynamic generation and mutual relevance of the elements in context. However, dynamic study embodies the holistic way of thinking, and intends to unveil the characteristics of humanity, construction, and interaction in context. The presentation of cognitive context, in one aspect, reflects the deepening of dynamic context study. The change of study perspective puts forth great enlightenment in methodology.
作者 胡霞 黄华新
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第2期104-107,共4页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 浙江省社联重点课题 (0 2 0 0 7)
关键词 语境 静态 动态 认知 context static dynamic cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Antal L.Content,Meaning ,and Understanding [M].Hague: Mouton&Co .1964.7.
  • 2[2]Griffin E.A First look at communication Theory(2nd edition)[M].New York: McGraw-Hill inc.,1994.58.
  • 3[4]Verschueren J.Understanding Pragmatics [M].Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,Edward Arnold,2000.75.
  • 4[5]Firth J R.Papers in linguistics[C].London: Oxford University Press,1957.226.
  • 5[6]Brown G,Yule G.Discourse Analysis[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2000.37.
  • 6[7]Lyons J.Introduction to theoretical Linguistics[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1977.410.
  • 7胡壮麟.语境研究的多元化[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(3):161-166. 被引量:314
  • 8[9]Akman V.Rethinking context as as a social construct [J].Journal of Pragmatics,2000,(32): 745.
  • 9[10]Lyons J.Semantics (Volume 2)[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1977.574.
  • 10[11]Mey J L.Pragmatics: An Introduction (Second edition) [M].Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,Blackwell Publishers Ltd,2001.40.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Akman, V. 2000. Rethinking Context as a social construct [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 743-759.
  • 2Allen, J. 1995. Natural Language Understanding[M]. Redwood City, CA:Benjamin/Cummings.
  • 3Beaugrande, R. 1980. Text, Discourse and Process:Towards a multi-disciplinary science of texts [M].London: Longman.
  • 4Brown, G. & G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Clark, H. H. & T. B. Carlson. 1992. Context for comprehension. In H. H. Clark (ed.). Arenas of Language Use [ C ]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press & Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  • 6Crystal, D. 1987/1991. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Ealy, L. 1998/1999. Understanding Contexts [M].Smith Weaver-Smith. On-line.
  • 9Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse Strategies [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Harris, W. V. 1988. Interpretive Acts: In Search of Meaning [ M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

共引文献321

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部