期刊文献+

对停车场收取扣留车辆保管费的法律研究——从语用学中“扣留”与“扣押”的区别说开去

Legal Study on the Collection of Custody Fee for Detained Vehicles in Parking Lot
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,无论在理论界还是实务界,经营性停车场是否应该收取扣留车辆保管费一直是一个热点问题。语用学研究表明法律用语中扣留与扣押有区别,交管部门没有支付车辆保管费的法律依据;车辆保管合同的公私法混合性质,论述了停车场收取车辆保管费的法理基础;最后通过对《机动车停放服务收费管理办法》相关条款的解读,再次说明了停车场收取车辆保管费的法律依据。 n recent years,whether the detained vehicle should be charged by the parking lot or not has become a hot issue both in the theoretical circle and practical circle.Firstly,this paper clarifies the two legal terms: detention and custody from the perspective of pragmatics and then demonstrates that the traffic management department has no legal base not to pay the custody fee for the detained vehicles.Secondly,this paper explains that the parking lot has the legal base to collect custody fees by analyzing the mixed nature of public and private law of the detained vehicle custody contract.Finally,this paper once again shows that the parking lot has the legal base to charge by interpreting the relevant provisions of 'the charging method for the service of vehicle parking'.
出处 《政法学刊》 2012年第5期82-87,共6页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 语用学 扣留 法理基础 公私法混合 pragmatics detain legal base mixture of pubic and private law
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1谢晖.私法基础与公法优位[J].法学,1995(8):31-34. 被引量:24
  • 2Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Longman Group Limited.
  • 3Levinson, Stephene. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Donnellan, 1966.
  • 5Rosenberg and Travis, 1971.
  • 6Katz & Nagel, 1974.
  • 7Mey, 1994. Mey.1994. Pragmatics. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. R. E. Asher(ed.). Pergamon.
  • 8Cresswell, M. J. 1988. Semantics essays. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Press Publishers.
  • 9Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 10Crice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部