摘要
共犯的处罚根据理论是德日刑法当中热议的话题,被称为"犯罪论的试金石"。现在,责任共犯论与不法共犯论已经逐渐退出了历史舞台,关于共犯的处罚根据的讨论主要是在惹起说内部展开的。只有与我国关于共犯的立法现状相联系,才能得出哪一种理论适合我国的司法实践的结论。修正惹起说正是在这样的前提下是可能的。同样,支持修正惹起说并不一定说明在整个犯罪论体系当中应当采纳结果无价值论的立场。
The Foundation of complicity punishment theory is a very controversial issue in Germany and Japan in recent years and is called 'the key element in the constitution of a crime theory'.Nowadays,the liability accomplices theory and transgression accomplices theory have been abandoned,and the arguments on the foundation of complicity punishment are within the border of modified provoking theory.Only if we give a full consideration to domestic criminal legislation can we find out which theory is more suitable for the judicial practice in China.Therefore,modified provoking theory is ascendant.At the same time,standing for the modified provoking theory does not mean that we should support the theory of consequence without value.
出处
《政法学刊》
2012年第6期63-68,共6页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
责任共犯论
不法共犯论
惹起说
结果无价值论
liability accomplices theory
transgression accomplices theory
provoking theory
theory of consequence without value