期刊文献+

市盈率与市净率之间的关系辨析——以沪市新股发行为例 被引量:9

The Relationship between Price-Earnings Ratios and Market-to-Book Ratios:Evidence from Shanghai Security Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 市盈率与市净率都是投资者评估资本市场中股票质量和公司价值的重要指标,理解这两个指标的经济实质和计算要求很有意义。依据2005年至2012年3月在沪市A股上市的100多家公司有关数据,采用实证研究的方法,对新股发行市盈率和市净率的整体水平以及行业特点等进行了较为深入的探讨,并就个股发行市盈率和市净率的有效性进行了比较分析。以此为基础,还将两者与新股发行首日表现的相关数据相结合进行了综合评价,以求对两者的作用有更为深入的了解。 It is of great significance to understand the economic substance and calculation of rice-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratios which are always important financial indexes for investors to evaluate the quality of stocks and the market value of companies.Based on the data of Shanghai Security Market from the year 2005 to 2012,this article aims at the levels,industry characteristics and effectiveness of price-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratios of IPO stocks by an empirical analysis.Furthermore,we examine the relationship between the price-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratios and the performance of IPO stocks in order to better understand the roles of these ratios.
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期53-59,共7页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJA630041)
关键词 市盈率 市净率 新股发行 首日涨幅 股票质量 公司价值 资本市场 股价收益比率 price-earnings ratio market-to-book ratio IPO stocks first-day performance stock quality corporate value capital market price earnings ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献46

  • 1刘熀松.股票内在投资价值理论与中国股市泡沫问题[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):45-53. 被引量:113
  • 2李寿喜.中国企业市盈率分布特征及其驱动因素的实证分析[J].贵州财经学院学报,2005(4):18-22. 被引量:1
  • 3杨善林,杨模荣,姚禄仕.股权分置改革与股票市场价值相关性研究[J].会计研究,2006(12):41-46. 被引量:41
  • 4Ball R.J., Brown P. 1968. An EmpiricalEvaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, (Autumn):159-178.
  • 5Beaver, W.H. 1968. The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, (Supplement 1968): 67-92.
  • 6Collins D.W., Maydew E.I., Weiss I. S. 1997. Changes in the Value-relevance of Earnings and Book Values Over the Past Forty Years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24: 39-67
  • 7Tangenes T. 2001. The Stochastic Parameter Approach to Residual Income Valuation Discussion paper. (4): 1-23.
  • 8Christensen P O, Fehham G A, Wu M G H. 2002. Cost of Capital in Residual Income for Performance Evaluation [J]. The Accounting Review, 77 (1): 1-23.
  • 9Plenborg T. 2001. Firm Valuation: Comparing the Residual Income and Discounted Cash Flow Approaches [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, (2) : 303-321.
  • 10Bernard V L. 1995. The Fehham-Ohlson Framework: Implications for Empiricists [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (2): 733-748.

共引文献77

同被引文献145

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部