摘要
市场化是我国30多年来渐进式改革实践的基本取向,而政府行为在市场化演进中的作用却是理论界聚讼不休的焦点问题。中国式分权背景下,政府行为在中国经济市场化演进中的作用机理及其逻辑框架为:由财政分权和政治集权驱动的我国地方政府竞争,对区域间的市场整合具有双刃效应。利用Krugman专业化指数计算全国30个省1999-2010年的地区专业化水平,在控制了各种变量之后,使用GMM方法考察地方政府竞争对地区专业化的影响。研究发现,地方政府行为中旨在促进要素自由流动的积极竞争(即顺市场力量)促进了地区专业化,而地方保护主义等消极竞争导致地区逐渐封闭并形成大而全的产业体系。此外,还发现地方政府竞争对地区专业化的影响具有区域差异效应和跨时效应。
The market-oriented economy has been the ultimate goal of the progressive reform practice in the past three decades in China.The role of the government has played in the evolution of the market-oriented economy has been one of the most controversial issues in the theoretical circles.In the context of Chinese decentralization style,this paper explores the mechanism of the government behavior and its logical framework in the evolution of the market economy in China.It argues that local government competition in China,driven by fiscal decentralization and political centralization,is a double-edged sword for inter-regional market integration.The paper uses the Krugman specialization index to calculate the level of regional specialization in the country's 30 provinces from 1999 to 2010 and further applies the GMM methods to examining the impact of the local government competition on regional specialization,after controlling for a variety of variables.It is found that positive behavior of the local government aiming to promote the free flow of factors(i.e.,the cis-market forces)could promote regional specialization while vicious competition such as local protectionism would result in closed regional economy and encourage a comprehensive and large industrial system.In addition,our findings suggest that the impact of the local government competition on regional specialization differs with regions and periods.
出处
《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期11-25,共15页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"政府竞争
企业并购与产业整合的机制与效应研究"(项目编号11BJY148)
山东省自然科学基金项目"我国企业并购的产业整合机制与效应研究"(项目编号2009ZRB02104)
山东大学自主创新基金青年团队项目"企业并购的决策机制
投融资行为与宏微观效应研究"
关键词
政府竞争
中国式分权
地方保护
地区专业化
government competition
fiscal decentralization with Chinese characteristics
local protectionism
regional specialization