期刊文献+

腹腔镜辅助近端胃癌根治术临床近期疗效 被引量:7

Comparative study of laparoscopic and open radical proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and factors associateed with complication
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜辅助近端胃癌根治术近期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2011年6月至2013年1月收治的48例腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术患者(腹腔镜组),同时选取临床资料与腹腔镜组相近的,行开腹近端胃癌根治术患者40例(开腹组)。比较两组在手术时间、出血量、清扫淋巴结数目、术后胃肠功能恢复时间和住院时间的情况。结果腹腔镜组手术时间、出血量、清扫淋巴结数目、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间分别为(164±38)min、(80±33)ml、(27.5±3.1)个、(2.5±0.8)d和(10.0±2.2)d。出血量、术后胃肠恢复时间、住院时间与开腹组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。按胃周淋巴结组别观察两组淋巴结数目,腹腔镜组的NO.4、10、11d淋巴结平均清扫数目与开腹组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术能够达到与开腹手术相同的根治效果,且具有创伤小、恢复快、安全等优点。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic and open radical proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and factors associateed with complication. Methods From June 2011 to January 2013, the hospital records of 48 gastric cancer patients were reviewed ( laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy, LAG group ). And 40 gastric cancer patients received open gastrectomy ( open group, OGgroup ). Operative time, blood loss, umber of lymph nodes dissected, time for passage of flatus and hosptial stay were analyzed in two groups. Results Operative time, blood loss, umber of lymph nodes dissected, time for passage of flatus and hosptial stay in LAG group was ( 164 ± 38 )min,( 80 ± 33 )ml, ( 27.5 ± 3.1 ),( 2.5 ± 0.8 )d and ( 10.0 ± 2.2 )d respectively. Blood loss, time for passage of flatus and hosptial stay were significantly lesser or shorter than in OG group ( P < 0.05 ). While the number of the retrieved NO.4sa.10.11d lymph node in LAG group were significantly more than those in OG group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusions Laparoscopy radical proximal gastrectomy is a safe ,feasible procedure,which achieves the same efficacy and leads to quick postoperative recovery.
出处 《中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)》 2013年第1期18-20,共3页 Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹腔镜手术 近端胃癌根治术 疗效 Laparoscopic Proximal gastrectomy Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Fujiwara M,Kodera Y,Misawa K. Long-term outcomes of early-stage gastric carcinoma patients treated with laparoscopy-as-sisted surgery[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons,2008,(01):138-143.doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.013.
  • 2Lee SI,Choi YS,Park DJ,el al. Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons,2006,(06):874-880.doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.02.028.
  • 3腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南(2007版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(6):476-480. 被引量:276
  • 4Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-2nd English Edition[J].Gastric Cancer:Official Journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association,1998.10-24.
  • 50htani H,Tamamori Y,NoguchiA K. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J].Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2010,(06):958-964.
  • 6Lee JH,Yom CK,Han HS. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2009,(08):1759-1763.
  • 7黄昌明,林建贤,郑朝辉,李平,谢建伟,王家镔.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫效果的临床对照研究[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(3):200-203. 被引量:61
  • 8郑朝辉,黄昌明,李平,谢建伟,王家镔,卢辉山.腹腔镜根治性全胃切除治疗胃底贲门癌的临床研究[J].中华消化外科杂志,2010,9(4):253-255. 被引量:18
  • 9Yasuda K,Shiraishi N,Etoh T. Long-term quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric caucer[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2007.2150-2053.

二级参考文献8

共引文献332

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部