摘要
阿奎利亚法的体系性、惩罚性和刑法特征决定了片断D.9.2.11.3.中的因果关系不能依假设因果关系理论来论证。二者在因果关系认定、行为定性和责任承担上有差别。阿奎利亚法上区分"介入因素"性质,对责任认定和范围产生影响。
The Lex Aquilia because of his punitive and duty standards decided that the fragment D.9.2.11.3 can not be proved as hypothetical causation.The determination of causation,conduct and compensation for damage are different.The Lex Aquilia distinguishes 'intervention' in nature,which have an impact on recognition and scope of responsibility.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2013年第3期120-122,共3页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
假设因果关系
假设原因
损害赔偿
Hypothetical Causation
Hypothetical Cause
Compensation for Damage
