期刊文献+

认知、伦理与世界观——认识论视域中的阴谋理论 被引量:2

Cognition,Ethics and World View:The Conspiracy Theories in the View of Epistemology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阴谋与阴谋理论通常意味着非理性、荒谬、偏执等,然而透过表象可以发现,人们之所以有如此印象,原因在于认知者自身可能带有一定的认知偏见,阴谋理论本质上完全可以有中立意义的理解。基于此,从认知态度、信念伦理,以及世界观等方面探究阴谋理论便有某种可能性,亦有较强的理论和现实意义。换个角度看,阴谋理论之盛行有其深刻的认识论源头,或许恰恰在于行动者自身。倘若真将其视为认知缺陷或世界观问题,要克服这样的缺陷或摆脱这样的问题几乎不可能;况且在认识实践中,如果阴谋理论被完全消除,那么对于丰富人们的认识无疑没有益处。 Conspiracy and conspiracy theories generally refer to irrationality,absurdity and paranoid,which may be due to the cognitive bias from cognizers.Conspiracy theories could have an essentially neutral understanding,so that it is possible to have a full exploration on conspiracy theories from cognitive attitudes,ethics of belief and world view,which results in more theoretical and practical significances.On the other hand,the wide popularity of conspiracy theories has profound epistemological sources or may result from agents themselves.If they are considered as the cognitive defects or the problems of world view,it is nearly impossible to rid them.Furthermore,if conspiracy theories are completely eliminated in the cognitive practice,it will not be good for people to enrich the understanding of the world.
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期112-121,159,共11页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 阴谋 阴谋理论 认知伦理 世界观 conspiracy conspiracy theories cognitive ethics world view
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1王庆原.信念伦理学的“克利夫特/詹姆斯之争”——兼论信念伦理学的建构[J].哲学动态,2010(6):97-103. 被引量:5
  • 2Greg Jarrett.Conspiracy Theories of Consciousness[J].Philosophical Studies.1999(1)
  • 3Alan Januszewski,J. Randall Koetting.Debunking the Conspiracy Theory[J].TechTrends.1998(1)
  • 4Shermer,Michael.Why people believe weirdthings[]..2002
  • 5Goertzel,B.Chaotic logic[]..1994
  • 6Moore,J.Conspiracy of one[]..1990
  • 7R.A.Wilson.Everything Is Under Con-trol:Conspiracies,Cults,and Cover-ups[]..1998
  • 8Wilson R.A.Everything Is Under Con-trol:Conspiracies,Cults,and Cover-ups[]..1998
  • 9Boym,Svetlana.Conspiracy Theories and Literary Eth-ics:Umberto Eco,Danilo Ki?and The Protocols of Zion[].Comparative Literature.1999
  • 10Boym,Svetlana.Conspiracy Theories and Lit-erary Ethics:Umberto Eco,Danilo Ki?and The Protocols ofZion[].Comparative Literature.1999

二级参考文献16

  • 1Timothy J. Madigan, W. K. Clifford and "The Ethics of Belief', Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2009, p. 73,p. 133,p. 171.
  • 2W. K. Clifford, "The Ethics of Belief", reprinted in Gerald D. McCarthy ( ed. ), The Ethics of Belief Debate, Atlanta, Ga: Scholars Press, 1986,p. 24.
  • 3P. Kauber, "The Foundations of James's Ethics of Belief" ,Ethics,Vol. 84,No. 2(Jan. ,1974) ,p. 151 ( note. 1 ), p. 153 ,p. 159.
  • 4W. James,"The Will to Believe" ,reprinted in Gerald D. McCarthy( ed. ), The Ethics of Belief Debate,Atlanta, Ga: Scholars Press, 1986,p. 60.
  • 5Allen W. Wood, "W. K. Clifford and the Ethics of Belief", Unsettling Obligations : Essays on Reason, Reality and the Ethics of Belief, California : CSLI Publications, 2002, p. 3, p. 15, pp. 15 - 16, pp. 19 - 20, p. 20 ( note. 22), pp. 21 - 22, p. 23, p. 36, pp. 24 - 40.
  • 6Susan. Haack," ' The Ethics of Belief' Reconsidered", Matthias Steup ( ed. ), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty : Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue, Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 28, p. 24.
  • 7G. L. Doore, "William James and the Ethics of Belief", Philosophy, Vol. 58, No. 225 (Jul. , 1983 ), p. 354, p. 357.
  • 8Louis P. Pojman, What Can We Know? An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge,Toronto: Thomson Learning,Inc. 2001, pp. 283 - 284, p. 285.
  • 9R. Gale, On the Nature and Existence of God, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 283.
  • 10D. S. Miller, "James's Doctrine of 'The Right to Believe'", The Philosophical Review, Vol. 51, No. 6 (Nov. , 1942), pp. 553 - 554.

共引文献4

同被引文献5

  • 1徐向东.论工具理性的规范性[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(3):29-38. 被引量:3
  • 2拉卡托斯.科学研究纲领方法论[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1986.125.
  • 3Keeley, Brian L. Of Conspiracy Theories[J].the Journal of Philosophy,1999, Vol. XCVI(3) :109 -126.
  • 4Clarke, Steve. Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing[J]. Philosophy of the Social Sciences,2002,Vol. 32(2) :131 - 150.
  • 5波普尔.《猜想与反驳》[M],傅季重、纪树立、周昌忠、蒋弋为译,上海:上海译文出版社,2005年版,第3、10页.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部