摘要
"连动说"是关于动补结构起源诸假说中影响最巨者。本文对这种学说立论的几个重要依据作了重新讨论,本文认为,动补结构的上字必须为他动、下字必须为自动或形容词的定义是不符合汉语事实的,应该修正;动补结构的下字与是否虚化没有关系,因此不能作为判断动补结构的标准;动补结构的下字为自动或形容词时,也不可以解释为"使动用法",整个结构不应该判断为连动结构,因此动补结构的起源与连动式没有必然的联系。
The Theory of Serial Verb Construction has the most important influence on the origin of V-C Construction.This article attempts to reconsider the several key arguments for the theory.This research concludes as follows:The first verb in the V-C Construction is not always stimulated while the second is an adjective or automated.The second verb is not related to its grammaticalization,therefore,this should not be the criteria for judging V-C Construction.Even when the second verb is an adjective or automated,it can not be explained as Causative Usage.It is not appropriate to take the whole construction as serial verb construction,thus the origin of V-C Construction is not necessarily related to Serial Verb Construction.
出处
《南开语言学刊》
CSSCI
2010年第1期88-94,187-188,共9页
Nankai Linguistics
基金
广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(06J08)的成果
关键词
动补结构
起源
连动说
虚化
使动用法
V-C Construction
origin
The Theory of Serial Verb Construction
grammat-icalization
Causative Usage
