西方人力资本理论的误区

Western Human Capital Theory and the Political Economic Reform in China

马克思的资本理论和西方的资本理论分属两种不同的理论分析范式,两种理论在认识逻辑、方法论基础和范畴内涵上都有本质区别。"人力"在马克思经济学分析范式中不是资本,可变资本不等于劳动力。舒尔茨等人将"人力"称为资本,只是意味着在西方主流经济学的生产函数中又增加了一种原来不为人们所认知的生产要素,技术分析的需要是其主要原因。他们将"人力"称作资本是对人才资源内涵的错置。人力资本理论盲目嫁接国内,会导致两种理论间范式冲突,误导经济学以及其他人文科学的研究方向。

Marx's capital theory and western capital theory fall into two different paradigms.There are basic differences between them in cognition logic,methodology foundation and categories connotations.In Marx's economic paradigm,'labor' does not have the fundamental characteristics of capital.Therefore,it can not become capital,and Variable Capital does not Equals to Labor.Theodore W.Schultz and other western economists regarding labor as human capital just means an unknown factors of production was added to the western economic production function,and the cause important is the need for technical analyzing.The essence that they regard labor as human capital is the shift of the basic meaning of human resource.But the confusion has been occurred between theory and practice because of paradigms conflict after it was introduced blindly into our country,and the research direction of economics and other humanities will be misguided.