期刊文献+

论西方经济学数学化和“脱思想化”趋势的方法论基础 被引量:3

On the Methodological Foundation of Mathematicalization and De-ideological Trend in Economics
原文传递
导出
摘要 现代经济学的数学化已成为这门学科的一个基本特征。数学化是对经济思想进行形式化的一种特定的方式,在形式化过程中某些思想内容将不可避免地丧失,因而不惜一切内容代价的数学化被称为"脱思想化"。"脱思想化"之所以能成为现代经济学的一种趋势,除了与数学本身的特点有关之外,还需要一个方法论基础。罗宾斯为经济学研究领域的狭窄化所做的方法论论证,以及新古典经济学在"理性经济人"这一基本行为假设下对经济理论的形式化,奠定了现代西方主流经济学的数学化和"脱思想化"的初步格局。但至关重要的还是弗里德曼的"假设不相关性"观点,该观点为经济学的数学化和"脱思想化"奠定了方法论基础。分析表明,这一观点是难以成立的,但它却影响深远。 The mathematicalization of modern economics has become a remarkable characteristic of the discipline.Mathematicalization is a particular way for the formalization of economic thoughts.But in the process of formalization there is necessarily some loss of thoughts.For this reason over mathematicalization at the sacrifice of thoughts is defined as deideology.The deideological trend in economics is grounded on certain methodological foundation,besides its intrinsic root in the mathematics itself.Lionel Robbins provided a methodological justification for the narrow definition of economic research field while neo-classical economics set down a framework for a highly formalized system of economic theory through the fundamental behavior assumption rational economic man.However, the most crucial work has to be owed to Milton Friedman and his famous argument,the irreleVancy of assumption,which provides a foundation for the dideological trend of modern economics.Although such an argument does not have a solid ground,its fundamental impacts on the mainstream economics should not be underestimated.
作者 林金忠
出处 《政治经济学评论》 2006年第2期154-167,共14页 China Review of Political Economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hall,R.L.,Hitch,C.J. The Price Theory and Business Behaviour . 1939
  • 2Robbins,Lionel. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science . 1935
  • 3.Readings in Price Theory[]..1952
  • 4Lester,R.A.Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage-employment problems[].The American Economist.1946
  • 5Fritz M.Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences[]..1978
  • 6Mark Blaug.Methodology of Economics[]..1992
  • 7Blaug,M. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain . 1992
  • 8B. Frey.Why economists disregard economic methodology[].Journal of Economic Methodology.2001
  • 9H.Sidgwick.Principles of Political Economy[]..1987

同被引文献34

  • 1林金忠.“实证经济学”与“实证迷信”——基于方法论视角的批判[J].学术月刊,2007,39(5):77-83. 被引量:7
  • 2O. J. Stigler et al (ed.) : Readings in Price Theory. Homewood (Ill.) : Richard D. Irwin, Inc. , 1952
  • 3中文版的《弗里德曼文萃》,第191-235页,北京经济学院出版社,2001.
  • 4马克·布劳格,罗杰·E·巴克豪斯编.《经济学方法论的新趋势》,北京,经济科学出版社,2000.
  • 5博兰·劳伦斯.《批判的经济学方法论》,北京,经济科学出版社,2000.
  • 6弗里德曼·弥尔顿.《弗里德曼文萃》,第191-235页,北京经济学院出版社,2001.
  • 7Blaug, Mark, 1992, Methodology of Economics (2nd edition), Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Frey, Bruno S. , 2001, "Why economists disregard economic methodology", Journal of Economic Methodology, 8 (1) 2001, pp. 41--47.
  • 9Hall, R. and Hitch, C. , 1939, "Price theory and business behaviour. " Oxford Economic Papers, No. 2.
  • 10Lester, R. A. , 1946, "Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage-employment problems." American Economic Reviezo, Vol. 36 (March).

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部