期刊文献+

现代自我认同何以可能——基于查尔斯·泰勒的道德地形学的思考 被引量:2

On Possibility Reasons of Modern Self-identity:Based on Moral Topography of Charles Taylor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在日益祛魅的当代社会中,价值逐渐从事实中剥离出来,道德的崇高意义日益褪色,自我认同、主体性重构等问题日益凸显。查尔斯·泰勒认为,在目前社会生活中,人们对日常生活的肯定无以复加,而对道德理想的关注付诸阙如,恰恰是层层积淀的道德理想和观念构成了人类生活的基石并改变着日常生活。当所有的价值理性、道德的崇高意义沦落为工具理性的替代物时,人之为人的特性就不复存在。查尔斯·泰勒建构了道德地形学、多元化的道德根源、强评估、本真性伦理等概念给无所适从的现代人提供了安身立命之所,给现代自我认同和主体性重建何以可能等问题提供了理论基础。事实上,这种建构善的、崇高意义的道德标准并非是宗教式的评判,而是在个人主义的基础上参阅历史上积淀下来的道德观念,在日常生活的交往基础上形成一种较好的评价标准。同时,这对解决我国社会生活中原子化、利己主义盛行的现象有一定借鉴意义。 The disenchantment is growing in the contemporary society and the value is gradually separating from fact.,In fact,the lofty meaning of moral is increasingly fading and the self-identity,subjectivity reconstruction problems are also being highlighted.Charles Taylor believed that people in the social life pay more attention to the daily life than to the moral ideal and concept which is actually the foundation of human life and that can change the daily life.When the value rationality and the lofty meaning of moral is replaced by the instrumental rationality,the characteristics of the human being's behavior would cease to exist.Charles Taylor raises the concept of The Moral Topography,diversity of moral roots,Strong moral evaluation,and the Ethics of Authenticity.Those concepts provide the theoretical foundation and basis for the self-identity and reconstruction of subjectivity.In fact,the construction of good,moral standards is not religious judgment,but a good evaluation criterion that are formed on the bases of interactions of everyday life.At the same time,this has certain reference significance to solve the atomization of social life and the prevalence phenomenon of the self-interest.
作者 吴玉彬
出处 《教育学术月刊》 北大核心 2013年第10期33-39,共7页 Education Research Monthly
基金 上海地方高校大文科研究生学术新人培育计划资助
关键词 道德地形学 强评估 本真性伦理 日常生活 道德理想 the moral topography strong moral evaluation the ethics of authenticity daily life moral ideal
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1鲍曼.流动的现代性[M]欧阳景根译.上海:上海三联书店,2002.
  • 2柏拉图.理想国[M]王扬译.北京:华夏出版社,2012.
  • 3卢梭.社会契约论[M]何兆武译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 4鲍曼.流动的生活[M]徐朝友译.南京:南京人民出版社,2012.
  • 5利科;汪堂家;李之喆.承认的过程[M]北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
  • 6鲍德里亚.符号政治经济学批判[M]夏莹译.南京:南京大学出版社,2009.
  • 7边沁.道德与立法原理导论[M]时殷弘译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
  • 8C.泰勒;程炼.本真性伦理[M]上海:上海三联书店,2012.
  • 9迪尔凯姆.社会学方法的准则[M]狄玉明译.北京:商务印书馆,2009.
  • 10霍耐特.为承认而斗争[M]胡继华译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005.

二级参考文献40

  • 1应星,吴飞,赵晓力,沈原.重新认识中国社会学的思想传统[J].社会学研究,2006(4):186-200. 被引量:45
  • 2加达默尔.真理与方法(上卷)[M].洪汉鼎译.上海译文出版社,1992.363,362,475,388,391,.391—392.
  • 3徐冰.社会科学方法论脉络中的诠释学进路[J].社会理论,2007(1):229-263. 被引量:1
  • 4弗洛伊德.释梦[M].孙名之译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 5Abbey,Ruth.2000.Charles Taylor.Princeton and Oxford:Princeton University Press.
  • 6Cooke,Maeve.1997."Authenticity and Autonomy:Taylor,Habermas and the Politics of Recognition."Political Theory,vol.25(2).
  • 7Durkheim,Emile.1995.The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.New York:The Free Press.
  • 8涂尔干,E.[1914]2006.人性的两重性及其社会条件[G]//乱伦禁忌及其起源.汲喆、付德根、渠东,译.上海人民出版社.
  • 9Giddens,Anthony.1992.Modernity and Self-Identity:Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.Cambridge,UK:Polity Press.
  • 10Habermas,Jurgen.1993."Struggle for recognition in constitutional states."European Philosophy,2.

共引文献1

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部