摘要
后现代主义是政治的还是去政治的?就此有两种声音:一者认为是去政治的;一者认为是政治的。细究起来就能发现,前者的"政治"实际还是指传统意义上的政治,即宏观政治,它以宏大叙事为其基础;后者的"政治"是指微观政治,它以微小叙事为其基础。既然后现代主义可界定为"怀疑宏大叙事",那它在自己的政治实践中,奉行的自然是"什么都行"这一"非常简单的主题思想",热烈地拥抱差异、多样性和多元主义,积极地反对统一、极权性和极权主义。
There are two voices in response to the question of whether postmodernism is political or apolitical.One says it is political;the other views it as apolitical.In reality,a careful study will help us find that politics,to the former voice,refers to the politics in its traditional sense,i.e.,macropolitics,which is based on grand narratives,while to the latter it just means micropolitics,which is built on little narratives.Postmodernism,defined 'as incredulity toward metanarratives' as Lyotard did,naturally takes up,in its practice of politics,'anything goes'-the 'simple enough message' that postmodernism has-which embraces difference,diversity and pluralism in opposition to unity,totality and totalitarianism.
出处
《当代外国文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期5-15,共11页
Contemporary Foreign Literature
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"战后世界进程与外国文学进程研究"(11&ZD137)之阶段性成果
