摘要
我国的典权与德国的担保用益或利用质押 ,以及法国与意大利的不动产质 ,是形式不同 ,但功能基本一致的法律制度。在我国民事立法中 ,应保留设置典权这一传统的法律制度 ,并注意不必再设置不动产质 ,以免重复立法。
The pawning right of China and the secured use and pledge of use of Germany, and the real property pledge of Germany and Italy are the different legal institutions in form, but identical in their basic functions. In the civil legislation of China, establishment of pawning right, a traditional legal institution, should be retained, and attention should be paid that to avoid repeating the legislation it's unnecessary to initiate real property pledge.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第4期21-32,共12页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
典权
担保用益
利用质押
不动产质
Pawning Right
Secured Use
Pledge of Use
Real Property Pledge