期刊文献+

希波的奥古斯丁[上] 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
作者 唐逸
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 1999年第2期32-38,53,共8页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

同被引文献56

  • 1唐逸.希波的奥古斯丁[下][J].哲学研究,1999(3):64-70. 被引量:2
  • 2张荣.“Si fallor,ergo Sum”──奥古斯丁对希腊哲学的批判和改造[J].哲学研究,1998(10):36-42. 被引量:6
  • 3Ronald S. Cole-Turner, "Anti-Heretical Issues and the Debate over Galatinas in the Letters of St.Augustine to St. Jerome," Augustinian Studles, vol. 11 (1980), p. 155.
  • 4Robert O'Connell, "When Saintly Fathers Feuded: The Correspondence between Augustine and Jerome," Thought, 54 (1979), pp. 344-364.
  • 5Ralph Hennings, "The Correspondence between Augustine and Jerome," Studia Patristica, 27 (1993).
  • 6W. H. C. Frend, "Fussala: Augustine's Crisis of credibility," Les Lettres de Saint Augustin par Johannes Divjak, Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1983, p. 251.
  • 7Ilona Opelt, "Augustins Epistula 20^* (Divjak) ein Zeugnis fur Lebendiges Punisch im 5. JH. Nach Christus," Augustinianum, 1985, pp. 121-132.
  • 8Martin Klockener, "Augustins Kriterien zu Einheit und Vielffalt in der Liturgie nach seinen Briefen 54 und 55," Liturgisches Jahrbuch, 41 (1991).
  • 9Daniel E. Doyle, "Doctrinal Discipline in the Letters of St. Augustine," Studia Patristica, 38 (2001),pp. 84-94.
  • 10Kauko K. Raikas, "The Principle of Juridical Vulgarization in the Letters of St. Augustine," J. Divjak(ed.), Studia Ephemerides Augustinianum, 31 (1990), pp. 413-425.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部