摘要
回顾大陆法系和我国法制的发展,便发现那种要求“法官审理案件只能以法律的明文规定为依据,司法解释和制例不具有立法功能”的成文法理论,不过是对大陆法系19世纪的历史描述而已;我国的立法及司法实践也早已告别这种传统成文法理论。现在该是理论上宣告其终结的时候了。
When we look back upon the development of the continental legal system and China's legal system, it can be found that the written law theory is nothing but a historical depiction of the continental legal system of the 19th century, which requires that a judge, when trying a case, should only go by the stipulations in explicit terms of the law and should believe that judicia1 explanations and guiding judicial decisions are of no legislative functions. China's present-day legislative and judicial practice has long parted from this traditional written law theory. Now it is high time to proclaim the ending of this theory.
出处
《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
1999年第1期81-85,共5页
Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基金
广西教委自筹经费立项研究课题
关键词
司法解释
典型案例
传统成文法
法制建设
judicial explanation, typical case, traditional written law theory, legalconstruction