摘要
我国犯罪构成中的犯罪对象,在不同的场合被赋予不同的含义。时被作犯罪客体的表现形式,有时被用作犯罪行为的直接指向,由此产生犯罪对象研究中的各种混乱。解决问题的思路,应该是将两种含义分离,前种属犯罪对象,后种则应另设行为对象的概念概括之。行为对象与犯罪对象有密切联系,许多情况下两者会发生重合,但其区别也是明显的:它们的作用不同,与行为的联系方式不同,在犯罪构成中的地位不同。因此在犯罪构成中,犯罪对象与行为对象是同时存在的概念,两者不能混淆,也不能互相代替。
There have been different meanings of criminal target in the composition of crime offenses in China under different circumstances. It means the conduct of the criminal objects sometimes, and other times it has been used as the targets of the offensive action. So it has led to the confusion in the study of criminal targets. To solve the problem, we should follow the thinking that the two meanings of the concept should be separated. The former means the criminal targets, the latter should be generalized into the concept means the objects of offensive action. The two concepts have close connections, but the differences between them are obvious too. They have different roles and positions in the composition of crime offenses, and should not be mixed and replaced with each other.
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
1998年第3期76-79,95,共5页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition