欧阳渐法相与唯识辨异略析

An Analysis of Ou Yang Jian's Distinguishing "Dharma-Laksana" and "Vijnana-Vade

中国近代佛学大师欧阳竟无，在其所著《瑜伽师地论叙》、《杂集论述记叙》、《瑜伽真实品叙》等著作中，判法相、唯识为二宗，为是时惊世之论。认“法相与法性为一种学”，“法相与唯识是两种学”，并条分缕析，详加论列。兹依所论归纳为四，疏作解读：一、缘起与线生；二、平等与疏胜；三、根本智与后得智；四、能变与所变。欧阳所依为印度佛学原始，并非标新杜撰。如果对判法相与唯识为二作哲学的诠解，乃大师追求终极本体与认知方法的不同。中国近代哲学如果缺少了博深的佛学的一面，是不完备的。

Ou Yang Jingwu, the great master of Buddhism, distinguished' DharmaLaksana' and 'Vijnana-Vade' as two different sects in his books which made an astonishing effect in the time. He took 'Dharma- Laksana' and 'Vijnana-Svabhava' as one school, 'Dharma-Laksana' and 'Vijnana-Vade' as two schools,and gave a detailed and thorough analysis of thern. Ou Yang's view was not made up by himself, but was based on the original Indian Buddhism. To understand Ou Yang's distinguishing of 'Dharma -Laksana 'and 'Vijnana -Vade', the key point was to understand that he tried to distinguish the different methods of ultimate noumenon and cognizance. Chinese philosophy would be imperfect without the profound and universal Buddhism as one aspectof it.