期刊文献+

重新理解科学合理性问题 被引量:1

Rationality of science reconsidered
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文揭露和否定了基础主义和现代哲学主体合理性,试图在吸收库恩和图尔明关于科学实践的集体性的见解的基础上,以科学活动的集体性质作为最基本的因素,来说明科学的合理性. The article puts forth the suggestion that rationality of science should be explained in terms of the collectiveness of scientific practice ,based on what the author understands as the main trends in the philosophy of science and what incorporated in T. Kuhn and S. Toulmin's attacks on foundationalism and formal rationality. Rationality of science does not amount to the collectiveness of science;yet,the lattet is most essential to the former. To account for the rationality of science in the light of its collectiveness is not to welcome such ideas as subjectivism, relativism or irrationalism; the most practical and effective way is to depart from them.
作者 周超
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 1998年第5期20-28,121,共10页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
  • 相关文献

同被引文献7

  • 1周超.波普的科学知识进化论[J].江汉论坛,1997(2):50-52. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]Kohon, Rachel. The Roots of Reason[J]. The Philosophical Review, 2000, (109).
  • 3[2]Healy, P. Situated Rationality and Hermeneutic Understanding: A Gadamerian Approach to Rationality[J]. International Philosophical Quarterly, 1996, (142).
  • 4[3]Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [M].Chicago: University of ChicagoPress, 1970.
  • 5[8][9][10][11]Popper, K.: Objective Knowledge, Oxford:The Clarendon Press, 1979, p.60,81,258,260.
  • 6[9][13]Popper, K.: The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions, in Ian Hacking (ed.), Scienfific Revolutions,Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981, p.88,94.
  • 7朱志方.皮尔士的科学哲学──反基础主义和可误论[J].自然辩证法通讯,1998,20(2):8-15. 被引量:16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部