摘要
本文针对否定论者认为“两结合”创作方法的提出缺乏创作基础;现实主义与浪漫主义不能结合;“两结合”创作方法没有质的规定性这样一些论点加以评驳,强调指出,“两结合”与革命现实主义的区别,在于所着力描绘的“现实”具有不同的特点;“两结合”与革命浪漫主义的区别,则在于所描绘的“理想”具有不同的特点;“两结合”创作方法的基本特征是努力塑造现实与理想高度统一的社会主义“新人”形象。
The paper critizes and refutes such allegations as: that the combination of realism and romanticism lacks a practical basis in actualiterary writing, that realism cannot be combined with romanticism, and that such a combination enjoys no qualitative definition. The paper gives emphasis to the point: the difference of this two-in-one combination from the revolutionary realism lies in the different denotations the 'reality', while its difference from revolutionary romanticism lies in of the different denotations of the 'ideal' to be depicted. The fundamental feature of the realismromanticism combination is demonstrated in its effort to portray the image of the socialist New Man, in whom reality and ideal are highly identified.
出处
《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
1985年第4期55-62,共8页
Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences