摘要
美国法典第41编第9章合同纠纷法(1978年)马龙译周忠海校第601条定义为本法所用的──第1款“行政机关首脑”指行政机关的首脑及首脑助手,也包括由行政机关首脑任命的下属主要机构的首席官员;第2款“行政机关”指第5编第101条所规定的行政部门,第5编...
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
1998年第3期95-102,82,共9页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
同被引文献13
-
1张红.美国刑事赔偿制度论要[J].行政法学研究,2005(4):95-108. 被引量:4
-
2最高人民法院民事审判第一庭.最高人民法院人身损害赔偿司法解释的理解和适用[M].人民法院出版社.2004.
-
3Adwin M.Borchard,Convicting the Innocent:Er-rors of Criminal Justice,New Haven:Yale University Press(1932):390.
-
4Adele Bernhard,"Justice Still Fails:A Review of Recent Effort to Compensate Individuals Who Have Been Unjustly Convicted and Later Exonerated,"Drake Law Review(2004):708.
-
5Adele Bernhard,"When Justice Fails:Indemnifi-cation for Unjust Conviction,"University of Chicago Law School Roundtable(1999),108.
-
6Janet Roberts and Elizabeth Stanton,"A Long Road Back After Exoneration,and Justice is Slow to Make Amends,"The New York Times,November 25,2007.
-
7Abby Aguirre et al.,"Exonerated,Freed,and What Happened Then,"The New York Times,November 25,2007.
-
8Craig Haney,"The Psychological Impact of Incar-cerations:Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment,"2001,http://aspe.hhs.gov/HSP/prison2home02/Haney.htm.
-
9Joan Petersilia,"When Prisoners Return to Communities:Political,Economic and Social Conse-quences,"Federal Probation 65(2001):3-9.
-
10何家弘.错判在英国如何认定[J].中国法学,2012,(1).
-
1朱效亮.美国商业秘密保护的来龙去脉[J].法学评论,1992,10(2):83-87. 被引量:6
-
2龙宗智.试论检察官的定位——兼评主诉检察官制度[J].人民检察,1999,0(7):6-10. 被引量:35
-
3金莉.检察改革重在实现检察司法化[J].青海检察,2001(1):16-19.
-
4潘强恩.重视人大对公务员的任免监督[J].乡镇企业导报,2013(5):14-16.
-
5周建民.民告官扫描[J].乡镇论坛,1995(3):31-31.
-
6苏木七.米兰达规则:嫌犯有权保持沉默[J].法律与生活,2015,0(12):22-23.
-
7T.D.Jakes.一块砖头[J].小读者,2009(4):7-7.
-
8程真.一块砖头[J].思维与智慧(下半月),2009(4):47-47.
-
9谢小剑.检察官“上命下从”的柔性[J].南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报),2008,28(4):111-113.
-
10徐丹彤.美国的县司法行政官[J].山西警官高等专科学校学报,2001,9(4):61-62.