摘要
本文对当前广泛流行于国内外的“‘克隆人’在伦理道德上不可接受”的观点提出了质疑.本文力图阐明的主要观点如下:1、人类自然而然的有性生殖并非无懈可击,克隆技术有限度地用于人类完善自身的目的也不会亵渎人的尊严.2、非治疗性的人体以及胚胎试验不一定侵犯人的权益,要求人体克隆技术万无一失是不实际也不公平的.3、割裂生育和性交的联系并非不合人之常情,人类的婚姻家庭模式也是可以变化的.在阐述中特别比较了“体外授精”与“人体克隆”在伦理道德上的可接受性,指出人们接受前者而拒绝后者实际上存在着“双重标准”.
In this treatise, the author poses a query to the viewpoint that 'human cloning is ethically unacceptable and contrary to morality', which is widespread at home and abroad. The viewpoints of this author are quite otherwise. First, the justification of the natural and sexual reproduction of human beings is not self - evident and invulnerable. To use the cloning technology limitedly on human beings will not impair human dignity. Second, test in human body or embryo that is not for the purpose of curing disease will not certainly infringe upon human rights. Any demand of applying the human cloning technology without any error is neither realistic nor fair. Third, to cut off the contacts between reproduction and sexual intercourse do not violate the ways of the world. The form of marriage and family is also changeable. In the course of explanation, the author specially makes a comparison between external fertilization' and ' human cloning', and indicates that accepting the former and rejecting the latter is actually a 'double standard'.
出处
《开放时代》
1997年第5期74-78,共5页
Open Times