弗雷格——罗素与克里普克的名称理论的本体论比较

An Ontological Comparison Between FregeRusserl's and Kripke's Theories of Names

以弗雷格和罗素为代表的关于名称的描述词理论与以克里普克为代表的历史的因果命名理论是分析哲学中关于名称问题的两个主要理论。本文的目的在于揭示这两个理论所依据的本体论前提,指出弗雷格和罗素强调事实是逻辑在先的,而克里普克强调客体是逻辑在先的。作者同时初步提出一个自己的命名理论纲要。

The essay aims at exposing the ontological presuppositions of the theories ofnames(Frege-Russerl's Versus Kripke's),and points out that frege and rus-sere stress that facts a.e logically primary,while Kripke stresses that objectsare logically primary.The author also expounds a framework of a comprehen-sive theory of names.