期刊文献+

基于制度要素的比较优势理论拓展——以交易成本经济学为视角 被引量:12

An Expansion of Comparative Advantage Theory Based on the Factor of Institution:From the Perspective of Transaction Costs Economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 制度是在处理人与人的关系时整合资源的资源,交易成本是在资源整合过程中使用制度要素的代价或价值牺牲。国际贸易中的交易成本则是使用国际贸易制度的代价,包括信息搜寻、交易磋商、进出口合同签订、进出口合同履行、争议处理与索赔等过程中所涉及的各项成本。制度差异可以塑造比较优势,使用制度要素而表现出来的交易成本是一国比较优势的重要成本基础。纳入交易成本后,基于总成本的比较优势可增强、削弱、抵消甚至"逆转"一国基于纯粹生产成本的比较优势状况。因此,通过制度创新降低对外贸易中的交易成本,是一国增强自身商品比较优势的重要途径之一。 Institution is resources of integrating resources when dealing with relationship among people, transaction costs are the price or sacrificed value of using the factor of institution in the process of integrating resources. Transaction costs of international trade are costs of using its institution, which include costs in the process of information searching, business negotiation, sign of import & export contract, performance of import & export contract, dispute settlement and claim etc.. Institutional difference can shape the comparative advantage, transaction costs when using the factor of institution are the important cost basis of a country’s comparative advantage. The comparative advantage based on total cost which includes transaction costs can enhance, reduce, offset, or even reverse a country’s comparative advantage based on the pure production costs. Therefore, reducing transaction costs of foreign trade through institutional innovation is one of the important ways for a country to enhance comparative advantage of its commodities.
作者 杨青龙
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期58-68,共11页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"综合成本上涨对长三角地区产业升级的影响研究"(12CJY004) 国家社会科学基金项目"基于全球服务价值链的我国现代服务业发展战略研究"(11CJL066) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)的成果之一
关键词 国际贸易 制度 交易成本 比较优势 international trade institution transaction costs comparative advantage
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Rapkin, D,Strand, D.Competitiveness:useful concept, political slogan or dangerous obsessionNational Competitiveness in a Global Economy,1995.
  • 2Nunn,N."Relationship-Specificity,Incomplete Contracts,and the Pattern of Trade,"Quarterly Journal,2007.
  • 3张杰,刘志彪.制度与国际贸易关系研究述评[J].商业经济与管理,2009(1):68-75. 被引量:5
  • 4MariannaBelloc.Institutions and International Trade: A Reconsideration of Comparative Advantage[J]Journal of Economic Surveys,2006(1).
  • 5Marcella Nicolini.On the evolution of institutional comparative advantages[J]Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2010(2).
  • 6苗东升.经济研究与复杂性科学[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010(2):30-36. 被引量:4
  • 7GREIF A.Institutions and international trade:lessons from the commercial revolutionThe American Economist,1992.
  • 8DEN BUTTER F A G,MOSCH R H J.Trade,trust and transaction costsTinbergen Institute Discussion PaperTI -/,2003.
  • 9DEARDORFF A.Local comparative advantage:trade costs and the pattern of tradeDiscussion Paper NoGerald RFord School of Public Policythe University of Michigan,2004.
  • 10张旭昆.“交易成本”概念:层次、分类[J].商业经济与管理,2012(4):64-70. 被引量:13

二级参考文献178

共引文献358

引证文献12

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部