期刊文献+

训诂方式与训诂方法的区分——以“声训”和“因声求义”为例 被引量:1

Discussion on Distinguishing the Method of Exegetical Studies and the Mode of Exegetical Studies——A Case Study of the "Sound Explanation" and "Inference Meanings from Sounds"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来,不少学者往往将训诂方法和训诂方式等同起来,或者混淆了二者之间的界限。有的学者将声训视为训诂方式,有的学者将声训视为训诂方法,也有的学者甚至把声训与因声求义等同起来。其实,训诂方法和训诂方式在训诂实践中有着本质上的区别。声训是训诂方式,因声求义则是训诂方法,不宜混淆二者之间的界限,亦不能将二者等同起来。 For a long time,quite a few of scholars have regarded the method of exegetical studies and the mode of exegetical studies as equal or mix them up.Some researchers regard sound explanation as the mode of exegetical studies,some regard sound explanation as method of exegetical studies,and even some regard sound explanation and inference meanings from sounds as equal.Actually,there are essential differences between the method of exegetical studies and the mode of exegetical studies in exegetical practice.Sound explanation is the mode of exegetical studies,while inferring meanings from sounds is the method of exegetical studies.We cannot confuse the limits of them and treat them as the same.
作者 段雪璐
出处 《湖北理工学院学报(人文社会科学版)》 2013年第1期77-80,共4页 Journal of Hubei Polytechnic University(Humanities And Social Sciences)
关键词 声训 因声求义 训诂方法 训诂方式 sound explanation inference meanings from sounds the method of exegetical studies the mode of exegetical studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1周大璞.训诂学初稿[M]武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008224.
  • 2冯浩菲.中国训诂学[M]济南:山东大学出版社,1995335.
  • 3郭芹纳.训诂学[M]北京:高等教育出版社,200553.
  • 4赵振铎.训诂学纲要[M]西安:陕西人民出版社,198789.
  • 5白兆麟.简明训诂学[M]杭州:浙江教育出版社,198478.
  • 6苏宝荣;武建宁.训诂学[M]北京:语文出版社,200557.
  • 7张永言.训诂学简论[M]武汉:华中工学院出版社,1985134-135.
  • 8周祖谟.汉语音韵学论文集[M]北京:商务印书馆,1957126.
  • 9黎千驹.现代训诂学导论[M]武汉:华中师范大学出版社,200865194215.
  • 10王宁;陆宗达.训诂方法论[M]北京:中国社会科学出版社,198378.

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部