意义的分析：实在论与反实在论的争论

The Analysis of Meaning: The Debate between Realism and Antirealism

分析哲学的主要任务是分析语言的意义。自７０年代以来，以戴维森为代表的实在论和以达米特为代表的反实在论围绕意义问题展开了激烈的争论，前者提出了以真理概念为基础的成真条件语义学理论，后者提出了以证实概念为基础的辨明条件语义学理论。本文分析了这场争论涉及的一些关键问题、争论双方的基本观点及主要策略，并探讨了双方基本观点可能蕴涵的不同的形上学立场。以此为基础，本文还对争论双方作了批判性的评论，而且提出了一种探索语言意义问题的新思路。

Abstract Analytical philosophy aims mainly for analyzing the meanings of language. Concerning this there has been a fierce argument between realism and antirealism since the 1970' s. D. Davidson who is the leading exponent of realism advanced the truth-condition semantics based on 'truth', and M. Dummett representing antirealism put forward the justification-condition semantics based upon 'verification'. In this paper the author makes some critical comments on main questions, ideas, tactics and metaphysical implications showed in the debate. The author also submits a new suggestion on the quest for the meanings of language.