试论人文精神探讨的思维方法问题

On ways of Thinking in the Humanistic Study

人文精神探讨中六种常见的思维方法是线性思维、高蹈思维、定格思维、定势思维、辩证思辨和实践理性思维；中西方两种母体思维机制是易学与辩证法。思维方法的优劣得失，不仅取决于运用的成败利钝，而且在于思维机制自身的人文品位与价值取向。从国际文化发展的态势和方法论与人文精神以及人类和平发展的内在联系方面来看，思维方法的变革是人文精神讨论的关键问题之一。

Abstract Six ways of thinking commonly employed in humanistic study are linear thinking, airy thinking, defined thinking, set thinking, speculative thinking, and practical reason thinking. It should be remined that Yi Jing and Dialectics as two primary sources of thinking are so deeply embedded in East and west cultures, repectively. Advantages and disadvantages of a particular way of thinking are not only seen in the success or failure of its application, but also reflects certain humanistic level and value orientation in the thinking mechanism itself. At present, finding and changing ways of thinking is already a key question for the humanistic study if we do not fail to examine the recent development of world culture and peaceful advancement of human societies in connection with finding a proper methodology to display humanities. In this regard, it is expected that the two major ways of thinking as representatives of East and West should be transformed and combined to help constitute China′s strategic plan for a new world culture.