期刊文献+

Same-day 2-L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl vs split 4-L PEG: Bowel cleansing for late-morning colonoscopy 被引量:7

Same-day 2-L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl vs split 4-L PEG: Bowel cleansing for late-morning colonoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, acceptability and feasibility of bisacodyl plus low volume polyethyleneglycol-citrate-simeticone(2-L PEG-CS) taken the same day as compared with conventional split-dose 4-L PEG for late morning colonoscopy. METHODS: Randomised, observer-blind, parallel group, comparative trial carried out in 2 centres. Out patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 85 years, undergoing colonoscopy for diagnostic investigation, colorectal cancer screening or follow-up were eligible. The PEG-CS group received 3 bisacodyl tablets(4 tablets for patients with constipation) at bedtime and 2-L PEG-CS in the morning starting 5 h before colonoscopy. The control group received a conventional 4-L PEG formulation given as split regimen; the morning dose was taken with the same schedule of the low volume preparation. The Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale(OBPS) score was used as the main outcome measure.RESULTS: A total of 164 subjects were enrolled and 154 completed the study; 78 in the PEG-CS group and 76 in the split 4-L PEG group. The two groups were comparable at baseline. The OBPS score in the PEG-CS group(3.09 ± 2.40) and in the PEG group(2.39 ± 2.55) were equivalent(difference +0.70; 95%CI:-0.09-1.48). This was confirmed by the rate of successful bowel cleansing in the PEG-CS group(89.7%) and in the PEG group(92.1%)(difference-2.4%; 95%CI:-11.406.70). PEG-CS was superior in terms of mucosa visibility compared to PEG(85.7% vs 72.4%, P = 0.042). There were no significant differences in caecum intubation rate, time to reach the caecum and withdrawal time between the two groups. The adenoma detection rate was similar(PEG-CS 43.6% vs PEG 44.7%). No serious adverse events occurred. No difference was found in tolerability of the bowel preparations. Compliance was equal in both groups: more than 90% of subjects drunk the whole solution. Willingness to repeat the same bowel preparations was about 90% for both regimes. CONCLUSION: Same-day PEG-CS is feasible, effective as split-dose 4-L PEG for late morning colonoscopy and does not interfere with work and daily activities the day before colonoscopy. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, acceptability and feasibility of bisacodyl plus low volume polyethyleneglycol-citrate-simeticone(2-L PEG-CS) taken the same day as compared with conventional split-dose 4-L PEG for late morning colonoscopy. METHODS: Randomised, observer-blind, parallel group, comparative trial carried out in 2 centres. Out patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 85 years, undergoing colonoscopy for diagnostic investigation, colorectal cancer screening or follow-up were eligible. The PEG-CS group received 3 bisacodyl tablets(4 tablets for patients with constipation) at bedtime and 2-L PEG-CS in the morning starting 5 h before colonoscopy. The control group received a conventional 4-L PEG formulation given as split regimen; the morning dose was taken with the same schedule of the low volume preparation. The Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale(OBPS) score was used as the main outcome measure.RESULTS: A total of 164 subjects were enrolled and 154 completed the study; 78 in the PEG-CS group and 76 in the split 4-L PEG group. The two groups were comparable at baseline. The OBPS score in the PEG-CS group(3.09 ± 2.40) and in the PEG group(2.39 ± 2.55) were equivalent(difference +0.70; 95%CI:-0.09-1.48). This was confirmed by the rate of successful bowel cleansing in the PEG-CS group(89.7%) and in the PEG group(92.1%)(difference-2.4%; 95%CI:-11.406.70). PEG-CS was superior in terms of mucosa visibility compared to PEG(85.7% vs 72.4%, P = 0.042). There were no significant differences in caecum intubation rate, time to reach the caecum and withdrawal time between the two groups. The adenoma detection rate was similar(PEG-CS 43.6% vs PEG 44.7%). No serious adverse events occurred. No difference was found in tolerability of the bowel preparations. Compliance was equal in both groups: more than 90% of subjects drunk the whole solution. Willingness to repeat the same bowel preparations was about 90% for both regimes. CONCLUSION: Same-day PEG-CS is feasible, effective as split-dose 4-L PEG for late morning colonoscopy and does not interfere with work and daily activities the day before colonoscopy.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 CAS 2013年第9期433-439,共7页 世界胃肠内镜杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 BOWEL PREPARATION Polyethyleneglycol SIMETHICONE Ottawa BOWEL PREPARATION Scale COLONOSCOPY Bowel preparation Polyethyleneglycol Simethicone Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale Colonoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Brintha K. Enestvedt,Christina Tofani,Loren A. Laine,Ann Tierney,M. Brian Fennerty.4-Liter Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Is Superior to Other Bowel Preparations, Based on Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2012 (11)
  • 2Suryakanth R. Gurudu,Francisco C. Ramirez,M. Edwyn Harrison,Jonathan A. Leighton,Michael D. Crowell.Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2012 (3)
  • 3Cesare Hassan,Lorenzo Fuccio,Mario Bruno,Nico Pagano,Cristiano Spada,Silvia Carrara,Chiara Giordanino,Emanuele Rondonotti,Gabriele Curcio,Pietro Dulbecco,Carlo Fabbri,Domenico Della Casa,Stefania Maiero,Adriana Simone,Federico Iacopini,Giuseppe Feliciangeli,Gianpiero Manes,Antonio Rinaldi,Angelo Zullo,Francesca Rogai,Alessandro Repici.A Predictive Model Identifies Patients Most Likely to Have Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy[J]. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2012 (5)
  • 4Todd W. Kilgore,Abdillahi A. Abdinoor,Nicholas M. Szary,Samuel W. Schowengerdt,Jamie B. Yust,Abhishek Choudhary,Michelle L. Matteson,Srinivas R. Puli,John B. Marshall,Matthew L. Bechtold.Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2011 (6)
  • 5Liucheng Wu,Yunfei Cao,Cun Liao,Jiahao Huang,Feng Gao.Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Simethicone for gastrointestinal endoscopic visibility[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 2011 (2)
  • 6Riccardo Marmo,Gianluca Rotondano,Giovanni Riccio,Armando Marone,Maria Antonia Bianco,Italo Stroppa,Anna Caruso,Nicola Pandolfo,Stefano Sansone,Elena Gregorio,Giuseppe D’Alvano,Nicoletta Procaccio,Pina Capo,Clelia Marmo,Livio Cipolletta.Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2010 (2)
  • 7Ali A. Siddiqui,Kenneth Yang,Stuart J. Spechler,Byron Cryer,Raquel Davila,Daisha Cipher,William V. Harford.Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2009 (3)
  • 8James Aisenberg.Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: shortening the “runway time”[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2009 (3)
  • 9F. Parente,B. Marino,C. Crosta.Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: A practical approach[J]. Digestive and Liver Disease . 2008 (2)
  • 10J. A.DIPALMA,J.MCGOWAN,M. Vb.CLEVELAND.Clinical trial: an efficacy evaluation of reduced bisacodyl given as part of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution preparation prior to colonoscopy[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics . 2007 (8)

共引文献1

同被引文献74

引证文献7

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部