期刊文献+

Single-port versus multi-port cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative analysis 被引量:6

Single-port versus multi-port cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND: Trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic gallbladder disease is becoming increasingly accepted worldwide. But so far, no reports exist about the challenging single-port surgery for acute cholecystitis. The objective of this study was to describe our experience with single-port cholecystectomy in comparison to the conventional laparoscopic technique. METHODS: Between August 2008 and March 2010, 73 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease and histopathological signs of acute cholecystitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy at our institution. Thirty-six patients were operated on with the single-port technique (SP group) and the data were compared with a control group of 37 patients who were treated with the multi-port technique (MP group). RESULTS: The mean age in the SP group was 61.5 (range 21-81) years and in the MP group was 60 (range 21-94) (P=0.712). Gender, ASA status and BMI were not significantly different. The number of white blood cells was different before [SP: 9.2 (range 2.8-78.4); MP: 13.2 (range 4.4-28.6); P=0.001] and after the operation [SP: 7.8 (range 3.5-184.8); MP: 11.1 (range 5-20.8); P=0.002]. Mean operating time was 88 (range 34-174) minutes in the SP group vs 94 (range 39-209) minutes in the MP group (P=0.147). Four patients (5%) required conversion to an open procedure (SP: 1; MP: 3; P=0.320). During the follow- up period of 332 (range 29-570) days in the SP group and 428 (range 111-619) days in the MP group (P=0.044), eleven (15%) patients developed postoperative complications (P=0.745) and two patients in the SP group required reoperation (P=0.154). CONCLUSIONS: Trans-umbilical single-port cholecystectomy for beginning acute cholecystitis is feasible and the complicationrate is comparable with the standard multi-port operation. In spite of our good results, these operations are difficult to perform and should only be done in high-volume centers for laparoscopic surgery with experience in single-port surgery. BACKGROUND: Trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic gallbladder disease is becoming increasingly accepted worldwide. But so far, no reports exist about the challenging single-port surgery for acute cholecystitis. The objective of this study was to describe our experience with single-port cholecystectomy in comparison to the conventional laparoscopic technique. METHODS: Between August 2008 and March 2010, 73 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease and histopathological signs of acute cholecystitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy at our institution. Thirty-six patients were operated on with the single-port technique (SP group) and the data were compared with a control group of 37 patients who were treated with the multi-port technique (MP group). RESULTS: The mean age in the SP group was 61.5 (range 21-81) years and in the MP group was 60 (range 21-94) (P=0.712). Gender, ASA status and BMI were not significantly different. The number of white blood cells was different before [SP: 9.2 (range 2.8-78.4); MP: 13.2 (range 4.4-28.6); P=0.001] and after the operation [SP: 7.8 (range 3.5-184.8); MP: 11.1 (range 5-20.8); P=0.002]. Mean operating time was 88 (range 34-174) minutes in the SP group vs 94 (range 39-209) minutes in the MP group (P=0.147). Four patients (5%) required conversion to an open procedure (SP: 1; MP: 3; P=0.320). During the follow- up period of 332 (range 29-570) days in the SP group and 428 (range 111-619) days in the MP group (P=0.044), eleven (15%) patients developed postoperative complications (P=0.745) and two patients in the SP group required reoperation (P=0.154). CONCLUSIONS: Trans-umbilical single-port cholecystectomy for beginning acute cholecystitis is feasible and the complicationrate is comparable with the standard multi-port operation. In spite of our good results, these operations are difficult to perform and should only be done in high-volume centers for laparoscopic surgery with experience in single-port surgery.
出处 《Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International》 SCIE CAS 2011年第5期521-525,共5页 国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)
关键词 laparoscopic surgery SINGLE-PORT CHOLECYSTECTOMY acute cholecystitis laparoscopic surgery single-port cholecystectomy acute cholecystitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Daniel Solomon,Robert L. Bell,Andrew J. Duffy,Kurt E. Roberts.Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (12)
  • 2Chris Edwards,Alan Bradshaw,Paul Ahearne,Pierre Dematos,Ted Humble,Randy Johnson,David Mauterer,Peeter Soosaar.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (9)
  • 3Paul G. Curcillo,Andrew S. Wu,Erica R. Podolsky,Casey Graybeal,Namir Katkhouda,Alex Saenz,Robert Dunham,Steven Fendley,Marc Neff,Chad Copper,Marc Bessler,Andrew A. Gumbs,Michael Norton,Antonio Iannelli,Rodney Mason,Ashkan Moazzez,Larry Cohen,Angela Mouhlas,Alex Poor.Single-port-access (SPATM) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (8)
  • 4Evangelos C. Tsimoyiannis,Konstantinos E. Tsimogiannis,George Pappas-Gogos,Charalampos Farantos,Nikolaos Benetatos,Paraskevi Mavridou,Adamantia Manataki.Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (8)
  • 5John R. Romanelli,Thomas B. Roshek,David C. Lynn,David B. Earle.Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (6)
  • 6Homero Rivas,Esteban Varela,Daniel Scott.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (6)
  • 7Kurt E. Roberts,Daniel Solomon,Andrew J. Duffy,Robert L. Bell.Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Surgeon’s Initial Experience with 56 Consecutive Cases and a Review of the Literature[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2010 (3)
  • 8Aziz M. Merchant,Michael W. Cook,Brent C. White,S. Scott Davis,John F. Sweeney,Edward Lin.Transumbilical Gelport Access Technique for Performing Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS)[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2009 (1)
  • 9R. Zorron,L. C. Maggioni,L. Pombo,A. L. Oliveira,G. L. Carvalho,M. Filgueiras.NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2008 (2)
  • 10D. Rattner.Introduction to NOTES White Paper[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2006 (2)

共引文献8

同被引文献35

  • 1朱江帆,胡海,马颖璋,徐曼珠,李峰,郁林海,肖怀文.经脐入路腹腔镜手术的初步临床报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(1):75-77. 被引量:143
  • 2Fernando Athayde Veloso Madureira,José Eduardo Ferreira Manso,Delta Madureira Fo,Antonio Carlos Garrido Iglesias.Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2013(3)
  • 3Muhammad S. Sajid,Nikhil Ladwa,Lorain Kalra,Kristian K. Hutson,Krishna K. Singh,Mazin Sayegh.Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials[J].World Journal of Surgery.2012(11)
  • 4M. Tahir Oruc,M. Umit Ugurlu,Zehra Boyacioglu.Transumbilical multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments[J].Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2012(6)
  • 5S. Trastulli,R. Cirocchi,J. Desiderio,S. Guarino,A. Santoro,A. Parisi,G. Noya,C. Boselli.Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single‐incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Br J Surg.2012(2)
  • 6Akira Sasaki,Masaaki Ogawa,Chihiro Tono,Shin Obara,Nobuyuki Hosoi,Go Wakabayashi.Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial[J].Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2012(5)
  • 7Mark Joseph,Michael R. Phillips,Timothy M. Farrell,Christopher C. Rupp.Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Associated With a Higher Bile Duct Injury Rate: A Review and a Word of Caution[J].Annals of Surgery.2012(1)
  • 8Ahmed Abdel-Raouf El-Geidie.Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) Using Harmonic Scalpel[J].Journal of Surgical Research.2012(1)
  • 9Melissa Phillips,Jeffrey Marks,Kurt Roberts,Roberto Tacchino,Raymond Onders,George DeNoto,Homero Rivas,Arsalla Islam,Nathaniel Soper,Gary Gecelter,Eugene Rubach,Paraskevas Paraskeva,Sajani Shah.Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2012(5)
  • 10David Yeo,Sean Mackay,David Martin.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2012(4)

引证文献6

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部