期刊文献+

Success rate and complications of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones over 2 cm in diameter 被引量:9

Success rate and complications of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones over 2 cm in diameter
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND:Clinically,common bile duct (CBD) stones >2 cm are difficult to remove by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).To evaluate this observation,the rates of successful clearance of CBD stones and complications were compared between ERCP extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm and <2 cm in diameter.METHODS:All patients who had undergone endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai First People’s Hospital from May 2004 to May 2008 were reviewed.Patients with CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter were enrolled in the >2 cm group.Two matched controls with CBD stones of <2 cm in diameter were selected for each enrolled patient (<2 cm group).Patient characteristics,success rates,and complications during and after ERCP were compared.RESULTS:Seventy-two patients constituted the >2 cm group and 144 patients were in the <2 cm group.No significant differences were found in the patient characteristics,except for stone size and CBD diameter.Both the overall success rate and the success rate in the first ERCP session were lower in the >2 cm group (77.8% and 58.3%,respectively) than in the <2 cm group (91.7% and 83.3%,P<0.01).During ERCP,the incidence of hypoxemia (30.6%) and hemorrhaging papillae (18.1%) in the >2 cm group was higher than in the <2 cm group (13.2% and 6.3%,P<0.05).After ERCP,the rates of delayed papillae hemorrhage (13.9%),hyperamylasemia (23.6%),acute pancreatitis (8.3%) and biliary infection (18.1%) were higher in the >2 cm group than in the <2 cm group (3.5%,11.1%,2.1%,and 2.8%,respectively,P<0.05).CONCLUSION:The success rate of endoscopic extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter was lower but the complication rate was higher than that of stones of <2 cm in diameter. BACKGROUND:Clinically,common bile duct (CBD) stones >2 cm are difficult to remove by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).To evaluate this observation,the rates of successful clearance of CBD stones and complications were compared between ERCP extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm and <2 cm in diameter.METHODS:All patients who had undergone endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai First People's Hospital from May 2004 to May 2008 were reviewed.Patients with CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter were enrolled in the >2 cm group.Two matched controls with CBD stones of <2 cm in diameter were selected for each enrolled patient (<2 cm group).Patient characteristics,success rates,and complications during and after ERCP were compared.RESULTS:Seventy-two patients constituted the >2 cm group and 144 patients were in the <2 cm group.No significant differences were found in the patient characteristics,except for stone size and CBD diameter.Both the overall success rate and the success rate in the first ERCP session were lower in the >2 cm group (77.8% and 58.3%,respectively) than in the <2 cm group (91.7% and 83.3%,P<0.01).During ERCP,the incidence of hypoxemia (30.6%) and hemorrhaging papillae (18.1%) in the >2 cm group was higher than in the <2 cm group (13.2% and 6.3%,P<0.05).After ERCP,the rates of delayed papillae hemorrhage (13.9%),hyperamylasemia (23.6%),acute pancreatitis (8.3%) and biliary infection (18.1%) were higher in the >2 cm group than in the <2 cm group (3.5%,11.1%,2.1%,and 2.8%,respectively,P<0.05).CONCLUSION:The success rate of endoscopic extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter was lower but the complication rate was higher than that of stones of <2 cm in diameter.
出处 《Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International》 SCIE CAS 2011年第4期403-407,共5页 国际肝胆胰疾病杂志(英文版)
关键词 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography common bile duct diseases GALLSTONE endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography common bile duct diseases gallstone
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Amir H Mohammad Alizadeh,Esmaeil S Afzali,Mirhadi Mousavi,Yaghoub Moaddab,Mohammad R Zali.Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcome from a single referral center in Iran[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2010,9(4):428-432. 被引量:3
  • 2Hyun Gun Kim,Young Koog Cheon,Young Deok Cho,Jong Ho Moon,Do Hyun Park,Tae Hoon Lee,Hyun Jong Choi,Sang-Heum Park,Joon Seong Lee,Moon Sung Lee.Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2009,15(34):4298-4304. 被引量:34
  • 3Wen-Hsiung Chang,Cheng-Hsin Chu,Tsang-En Wang,Ming-Jen Chen,Ching-Chung Lin.Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(4):593-596. 被引量:24
  • 4Ahmet Tekin,Zekai Ogetman.Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct with a Rigid Scope in Patients with Problematic Choledocholithiasis[J]. World Journal of Surgery . 2010 (8)
  • 5Rajeev Attam,Martin L. Freeman.Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Hepato - Biliary - Pancreatic Surgery . 2009 (5)
  • 6P. Salminen,S. Laine,R. Gullichsen.Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: Analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2008 (9)
  • 7Samardzic J,Latic F,Kraljik D,Pitlovic V,Mrkovic H,Miskic D,et al.Treatment of common bile duct stones--is the role of ERCP changed in era of minimally invasive surgery. Medicinski Arhiv . 2010
  • 8Rogers SJ,Cello JP,Horn JK,Siperstein AE,Schecter WP,Campbell AR,et al.Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Archives of Surgery . 2010
  • 9Dufek V,Benes J,Chmel J,Kordac V.Biliary endoprosthesis in the treatment of large common bile duct stones. Endoscopy . 1990
  • 10Kubota,Y,Takaoka,M,Fujimura,K,Ogura,M,Kin,H,Yamamoto,S.Endoscopic endoprosthesis for large stones in the common bile duct. Journal of Internal Medicine . 1994

二级参考文献63

  • 1Georgios Karamanolis,Aikaterini Katsikani,Nikos Viazis,Gerasimos Stefanidis,Spilios Manolakopoulos,Spiros Sgouros,Efthimia Papadopoulou,Apostolos Mantides.A prospective cross-over study using a sphincterotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(11):1649-1652. 被引量:3
  • 2Tze-Zen Ong,Jen-Lock Khor,Dede-Sutedja Selamat,Khay-Guan Yeoh,Khek-Yu Ho.Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: A tertiary center experience[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(33):5209-5212. 被引量:21
  • 3Atsushi Minami,Shinji Hirose,Tomohiro Nomoto,Shoichiro Hayakawa.Small sphincterotomy combined with papillary dilation with large balloon permits retrieval of large stones without mechanical lithotripsy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(15):2179-2182. 被引量:24
  • 4Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami I. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 20:148-151.
  • 5Cart-Locke DL. Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl): S170-S174.
  • 6Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, Yasuda I, Hasebe O, Igarashi Y, Murakami A, Mukai H, Fujii T, Yamao K, Maeshiro K.JESED Study Group. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:151-155.
  • 7Cipolletta L, Costamagna G, Bianco MA, Rotondano G,Piscopo R, Mutignani M, Marmo R. Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1997;84:1407-1409.
  • 8Van Dam J, Sivak MV. Mechanical lithotripsy of large common bile duct stones. Cleve Clin J Med 1993; 60:38-42.
  • 9Higuchi T, Kon Y. Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy for the treatment of common bile duct stone. Experience with the improved double sheath basket catheter. Endoscopy 1987; 19:216-217.
  • 10Shaw MJ, Dorsher PJ, Vennes JA. A new mechanical lithotripter for treatment of large common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:796-808.

共引文献72

同被引文献53

引证文献9

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部