摘要
Bioartificial liver assist devices (BALs) offer anopportunity for critical care physicians and transplantsurgeons to stabilize patients prior to orthotopic livertransplantation. Such devices may also act as a bridgeto transplant, providing liver support to patientsawaiting transplant, or as support for patients post liv-ing-related donor transplant. Four BAL devices thatrely on hepatocytes cultured in hollow fiber membranecartridges (Circe Biomedical HepatAssist (r), VitagenELADTM, Gerlach BELS, and Excorp Medical BLSS)are currently in various stages of clinical evalua-tion. Comparison of the four devices shows that severalunique approaches based upon the same overall systemarchitecture are possible. Preliminary results of theExcorp Medical BLSS Phase I safety evaluation at theUniversity of Pittsburgh, after treating four patients(F, 41, acetominophen-induced, two support periods;M, 50, Wilson's disease, one support period; F, 53, a-cute alcoholic hepatitis, two support periods; F, 24,chemotherapy-induced, one support period) are pre-sented. All patients presented with hypoglycemia andtransient hypotension at the start of extracorporealperfusion. Hypoglycemia was treated by IV dextroseand the transient hypotension responded positively toIV fluid bolus. Heparin anticoagulation was used onlyin the second patient. No serious or adverse eventswere noted in the four patients. Moderate biochemicalresponse to support was noted in all patients. Morecomplete characterization of the safety of the BLSSrequires completion of the Phase I safety evaluation.
Bioartificial liver assist devices (BALs) offer anopportunity for critical care physicians and transplantsurgeons to stabilize patients prior to orthotopic livertransplantation. Such devices may also act as a bridgeto transplant, providing liver support to patientsawaiting transplant, or as support for patients post liv-ing-related donor transplant. Four BAL devices thatrely on hepatocytes cultured in hollow fiber membranecartridges (Circe Biomedical HepatAssist (r), VitagenELADTM, Gerlach BELS, and Excorp Medical BLSS)are currently in various stages of clinical evalua-tion. Comparison of the four devices shows that severalunique approaches based upon the same overall systemarchitecture are possible. Preliminary results of theExcorp Medical BLSS Phase I safety evaluation at theUniversity of Pittsburgh, after treating four patients(F, 41, acetominophen-induced, two support periods;M, 50, Wilson's disease, one support period; F, 53, a-cute alcoholic hepatitis, two support periods; F, 24,chemotherapy-induced, one support period) are pre-sented. All patients presented with hypoglycemia andtransient hypotension at the start of extracorporealperfusion. Hypoglycemia was treated by IV dextroseand the transient hypotension responded positively toIV fluid bolus. Heparin anticoagulation was used onlyin the second patient. No serious or adverse eventswere noted in the four patients. Moderate biochemicalresponse to support was noted in all patients. Morecomplete characterization of the safety of the BLSSrequires completion of the Phase I safety evaluation.
