期刊文献+

六种释放曲线相似性评价方法在非洛地平缓释片中的应用比较 被引量:6

Comparison and application of six similarity evaluation methods of release profiles in felodipine sustained release tablets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较使用6种不同释放度评价方法在非洛地平缓释片相似性中的应用。方法采用探索性数据分析、单变量方差分析、RESCIGNO指数法、差异因子与相似因子法、威布尔模型拟合和相似等效限法对非洛地平缓释片溶出试验数据进行统计分析。结果探索性数据分析、单变量方差分析的多数时间点的释放度无差异,RESCIGNO指数ξ1=0.0284,ξ2=0.0320,差异因子1=6.45(1【15),相似因子2=64.54(2】50),威布尔模型中原研药与自制药的td和t50的P值分别为0.064和0.062(P】0.05),自制药在测定时间点的释放度均落在原研药的88%~112%内。结论 6种相似性评价方法均适用于非洛地平缓释片释放行为的评价。 Objective To compare six different release rate evaluation methods applied to assess the dissolution similarity of felodipine loaded brand product and self made sustained release tablets.Methods The release rate of the felodipine sustained release tablets was statistical analyzed by the Exploratory data analysis method,Univariate ANOVA method,RESCIGNO index method,difference factor(f 1) and similar factor(f 2) method,the fitting of Weibull model method and Chow and Ki’s method.Results In vitro of release profiles were not significantly different with the most time points in Exploratory Data Analysis and Univariate ANOVA method,RESCIGNO index ξ 1 =0.028 4 and ξ 2 =0.032 0,difference factor 1 =6.45(1 <15)and similar factor 2 =64.54(2 >50),the P value of t d and t 50 was 0.064 and 0.062(P>0.05).In vitro release of the self-made preparation falled in the range of 88% to 112% of the brand product at all time points.Conclusion Six similarity evaluation methods are all suitable to evaluate the release behavior of felodipine sustained release tablets.
出处 《中国药剂学杂志(网络版)》 2013年第4期78-83,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutics:Online Edition
关键词 非洛地平 缓释片 体外释放 相似性 评价方法 felodipine sustaind release tablet in vitro release similarity evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1刘丹.非洛地平的药理及临床应用[J].中国医药指南,2011,9(16):258-259. 被引量:8
  • 2王昕,唐素芳,高立勤.溶出曲线相似性的两种评价方法[J].天津药学,2011,23(1):53-56. 被引量:50
  • 3谢沐风.溶出曲线相似性的评价方法[J].中国医药工业杂志,2009,40(4):308-311. 被引量:355
  • 4陈贤春,吴清,王玉蓉,李冀湘.关于溶出曲线比较和评价方法[J].中国医院药学杂志,2007,27(5):662-664. 被引量:66
  • 5Nilufer Yuksel,Arzu E Kan?k,Tamer Baykara.Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by ANOVA-based, model-dependent and - independent methods[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics . 2000 (1)
  • 6Thomas O’Hara,Adrian Dunne,Jackie Butler,John Devane.A review of methods used to compare dissolution profile data[J]. Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today . 1997 (5)
  • 7Shein-Chung Chow,Y.c.Ki Fanny.Statistical comparison between dissolution profiles of drug products[J]. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics . 1997 (2)
  • 8Polli J E,Rekhi G S,Augsburger L L,et al.Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences . 1997
  • 9Moore J;Flanner H.Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles,1996(06).
  • 10Polli JE,Rekhi GS,Shah VP.Methods to compare dissolu- tion profiles. Drug Information Journal . 1996

二级参考文献46

共引文献431

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部