期刊文献+

杭甬高速公路不同预测模型比较 被引量:2

The Comparison of Different Prediction Model on HANGYON High Way
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对当前我国道路交通噪声预测中应用得极为广泛的两种模式:我国交通部推荐的预测模型和美国联邦公路管理局(FHWA)公路噪声预测模型在进行预测时的比较研究。通过比较分析了FHWA预测模式和交通部预测模式在杭甬高速公路不同条件下的预测结果,并对预测结果和实测结果进行预测精度的比较,得出FHWA预测模式和实测符合较好。 There are two widely used models for predicting noise levels in transportation. One is recommended by the Chinese Transportation Ministry. . The other is recommended by the united States Federal High Way Authority( FHWA). This thesis compared the above two models. By using both the Prediction Models from Transportation Ministry and the FHWA models, the prediction results were analyzed for Hangyon high Way at different road conditions. The prediction results and the actual results were compared and the accuracy of prediction were assessed. It was found that the FHWA model gave a more accurate prediction.
机构地区 嘉兴学院 浙江大学
出处 《噪声与振动控制》 CSCD 2004年第4期35-38,共4页 Noise and Vibration Control
关键词 声学 高速公路 交通噪声 预测模式 等效连续声级 acoustics high way traffic noise prediction model continuous sound level
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1arry T M, Reagan J. FHWA-RD-77-108, FHWA highway traffic noise prediction model, U. S. Department of Transportation. Washington DC: 1978.
  • 2Department of Transport and Welsh office of U. K(DoTUK), Calculation of road traffic noise. London: HMSO. 1988.
  • 3Hans Bendtsen. The Nordic prediction method for road traffic noise the Science of the Total Environment, 1999,235,331-338.
  • 4JTJ005-96.9-11.中华人民共和国交通部公路建设项目环境影响评价规范(试行)[S].[S].,..
  • 5HJT2.4-1995.17-18.环境影响评价技术导则-声环境[S].[S].国家环境保护总局,..
  • 6涂瑞和,刘光辉,柳至和.关于应用美国FHWA公路噪声预测模式的几个问题[J].环境工程,1992,10(2):41-44. 被引量:23
  • 7李本纲,陶澍.道路交通噪声预测模型研究进展[J].环境科学研究,2002,15(2):56-59. 被引量:39

二级参考文献18

共引文献61

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部