期刊文献+

制度主义视角下的国际制度与认同关系分析

An Analysis of the Relationship between International Institution and Identity from the Institutionalist View
下载PDF
导出
摘要 制度主义认为,认同是国际交往中的一个重要因素,尤其是在国家参与国际制度的进程中,认同与制度化构成一个互动的关系。正向的国家间认同为制度化发展打下良好的基础,国际制度则为国家认同的塑造提供平台,高级制度化伴随着一个国家内化规范及认同建构的过程。探讨国家认同的含义和来源,分析认同与制度化的互动关系对于认识国家间关系的互动很有意义。第二次世界大战后的欧美关系的发展就是一个认同与制度化良好互动的典型例证。欧美在良好认同的基础上开始制度化进程,而在国际制度基础上的国家间交往,则进一步加深双方对彼此的认知程度,改变它们对安全、权力、利益和主导规范的认识,推动欧美关系朝着积极的方向发展,最终建立一个稳定有效的"跨大西洋安全共同体"。 Institutionalism holds that Identity is an important factor in international communication, especiallywhen countries participate in the international institutions. In this process, identity and institutionalization form aninteractive relationship. Positive national identity could lay a good foundation for the development ofinstitutionalization, while international institutions could provide a platform for the development of common identity,which means institutionalization always contains a national internalized norms and identity construction process. Itis very useful to discuss the meaning and the origin of the national identity, and to analyze the interactiverelationship between identity and institution. The development of transatlantic relations is an example of positiveinteraction of identification and institutionalization. Based on a good basis, these two sides started theinstitutionalization, while on the platform of international institutions, the development of transatlantic relationsmoved forward, which further deepened their cognition on each other, and changed their understanding of safety,power, interest and the leading norms. At the end, all of these factors together promoted the transatlantic relationsto a positive direction, and ultimately established a stable and effective 'Transatlantic Security Community'.
作者 李海龙
出处 《长江师范学院学报》 2014年第3期98-102,140,共5页 Journal of Yangtze Normal University
关键词 认同 国际制度 跨大西洋安全共同体 identity international institution Transatlantic Security Community
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Robert O.Keohane. International Institutions:Two Approaches[J].INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY,1988,(04):379-396.
  • 2亚历山大·温特;秦亚青.国际政治的社会理论嗍[M]上海:上海世纪出版社,2008216.
  • 3W.Carlsnaes,Thomas Risse,B.Simmons. Handbook of International Relations[M].London:Sage Publication,2006.102.
  • 4Friedrich Kratochwil. History,Action and Identity:Revisiting the "Second"Great Debate and Assessing its Importance for Social Theory[J].EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS,2006,(01):5-29.
  • 5McCall George,J.L.Simmons. Identities and Interactions[M].New York:Free Press,1966.69.
  • 6W.G.Austin,S.Worchel,Monteret. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations[M].Calif:Brooks / Cole,1979.33-47.
  • 7Oran Young. Political Leadership and Regime Formation:On the Development of Institutions in International Society[J].Internatiornal Organization,1991,(03):281-308.
  • 8Anne~Marie Slaughter. International Law in a Word of Liberal States[J].EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,1995,(01):530-538.
  • 9Jacob Ole Sending. Constitution,Choice and Change:Problems with the"Logic of Appropriateness" and its Use in Constructivist Theory[J].EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS,2002,(04):443-470.
  • 10阿米塔·阿查亚;王正毅.建构安全共同体:东盟与地区秩序[M]上海:上海人民出版社,200437.

二级参考文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部