期刊文献+

学校是如何塑造教师的 被引量:1

Ways of Shaping School-teachers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师是如何塑造而成的,什么机制(包括因素与过程)塑造了教师,一直是教师研究的重要议题。文章以学术研究取向的演变为线索,依次论述了结构-功能取向、互动取向、批判取向和实践取向的教师形塑机制的学术渊源、研究主题、研究方法、研究关系和研究内容,并对这四种取向进行了评议。这四种取向从不同角度深化了人们对教师及其工作的理解,但现有研究未能全面地深入揭示学校中的教师形塑机制,忽略了教师文化的民族历史特征。此外,国内相关经验研究较少,有待进一步加强。 It has been crucial issues that how school-teachers have been shaped into what they are today and what kind of mechanism(including factors and processes) has shaped them. Based on the changes of research approaches, this paper has categorized them into four types: structural-functional approach, interactive approach, critical approach and practical approach. Reviewing their academic origins, topics, methods, objects as well as relations between them, this article has given its opinions about the four types respectively, and believes that even all of them have deepened people's understanding about school-teachers and their work, they failed to reveal the comprehensive mechanism in which school-teachers are shaped and also paid little attention to school-teachers' national and historical features. Since academic studies on these very issues are still not enough and this paper will hopefully make its own contributions.
作者 江涛
出处 《教育学术月刊》 北大核心 2014年第3期60-68,共9页 Education Research Monthly
关键词 基础教育 中小学教师 形塑机制 文献综述 elementary and middle school education school-teacher shaping mechanism literature review
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Elizabeth J. Hatton.Hidden pedagogy as an account of pedagogical conservatism[J].Journal of Curriculum Studies.1987(5)
  • 2Andrew Pollard.A Model of Classroom Coping Strategies[J].British Journal of Sociology of Education.1982(1)
  • 3李伟.回归实践 回到理解——从芝加哥大学教育学院停办看美国教育研究范式的转换[J].比较教育研究,2008,29(7):12-16. 被引量:24
  • 4Jan Helge Kallestad,Dan Olweus.Teachers’ Emphases on General Educational Goals: a study of Norwegian teachers[J].Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.1998(3)
  • 5John Elliott.Educational Research in Crisis: performance indicators and the decline in excellence[J].British Educational Research Journal.1990(1)
  • 6Douwe Beijaard,Nico Verloop,Jan D Vermunt.Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective[J].Teaching and Teacher Education.2000(7)
  • 7Christopher Day,Maria Assuncao Flores,Isabel Viana.Effects of national policies on teachers’ sense of professionalism: findings from an empirical study in Portugal and in England[J].European Journal of Teacher Education.2007(3)
  • 8刘云杉.文化政治工作者:从教师角色到教师认同[J].教育研究与实验,2008(1):23-27. 被引量:8
  • 9周勇.芝加哥大学教育系的悲剧命运[J].读书,2010(3):80-89. 被引量:29
  • 10Brian D. Barrett.No Child Left Behind and the assault on teachers’ professional practices and identities[J].Teaching and Teacher Education.2009(8)

二级参考文献50

  • 1王顶明.对专业认同有关概念的理论述评[J].学园(学者的精神家园),2008(2):32-38. 被引量:61
  • 2张军凤.教师的专业身份认同[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(04A):39-41. 被引量:77
  • 3郭丁荧.教师的多维影像:教师角色之社会学论述.台北师范学院学报,2003,(2).
  • 4黄庭康,葛兰西.国家权力与文化霸权[J].苏峰山.意识权力与教育--教育社会学理论导读[C].南华大学教育社会学研究所,2005..
  • 5卯静儒.个人的/政治的:艾波的权力、知识和教育[J].苏峰山.意识权力与教育--教育社会学理论导读[C].南华大学教育社会学研究所,2005..
  • 6Richardson, V. & Plaeier, P. Teacherchange[A]. Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed. )[C]. Washington, D. C. : American Educational Research Association. 2001. 905-950.
  • 7Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. Teacher development and educational change [A]. Fullan, M. & Haregreaves, A.(Eds.), Teacher development and educational change[C]. London: The Falmer Press. 1992. 1-9.
  • 8Wagner, To Leadership for learning: An action theory of school change[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2001, (5).
  • 9Bardwick, J. M. Danger in comfort zone[M]. New York: American Management Association. 1991.
  • 10Fullan, M. Leading in a culture of change [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2001. 75.

共引文献319

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部