期刊文献+

128例心力衰竭患者标准疗法治疗临床对比分析

128例心力衰竭患者标准疗法治疗临床对比分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察标准疗法与传统常规疗法治疗心力衰竭的疗效。方法观察标准治疗组与传统常规治疗组患者症状、体征、肺部啰音及EF值变化。结果标准治疗组患者症状、体征、肺部啰音及EF值明显改善。结论标准疗法治疗心力衰竭疗效显著。 Objective To observe the differences on curative effect between standard therapy and traditional and conventional therapy on myocardium prostration.Methods To observe the variation on symptoms,body characters,lung rale and the EF values of patients treated with standard and conventional therapy.Results the patients treated with standard therapy are obviously improved on symptoms,body characters,lung rale and the EF values.Conclusion The curative effect of standard therapy on myocardium prostration is better and conspicuous.
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2007年第5期54-55,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词 标准疗法 心力衰竭 Standard therapy Myocardium prostration
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Givertz MM,collucci WS.Newtargets for heart failure therapy:endo-thelin,inflammatory cytokines,oxidative stress[].The Lancet.1998
  • 2Braunwald E,Bristow MR.Congestive heart failure[].Circulation.2000
  • 3BristowMR.β-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failuce[].Circulation.2000
  • 4Wilson S.Molecular and cellular mechanis ms of myocardial failure[].The American Journal of Cardiology.1997

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部