期刊文献+

WTO争端方以双边协议解决多边程序问题——以DSU“适用顺序”为视角

WTO Members in Disputes Solving Multilateral Procedural Problems by Reaching Bilateral Agreement:From the Perspective of the DSU Sequencing Issue
原文传递
导出
摘要 《关于争端解决规则与程序的谅解》(DSU)对第21.5条和第22条在程序适用上孰先孰后缺乏明确规定,且两条款项下的程序时限还存在冲突。WTO首例涉及"适用顺序"问题的案件通过将第21.5条程序并入第22条程序的"妥协"模式解决这一多边问题,但此案之后,包括中国在内的40多起案件的争端方,则在争端解决过程中通过达成适用于个案的双边协议模式解决,本文通过梳理总结已有的WTO争端解决实践对如何从根本上解决DSU适用顺序问题提出建议。 The sequencing issue arising between Article 21.5 and 22 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes first occurred in 'European Communities–Regime for the Importation,Sale and Distribution of Bananas' and was solved by consolidating Article 21.5 proceeding into Article 22.6 arbitration process.Thereafter,WTO parties in disputes including China in over 40 cases reached ad hoc bilateral sequencing agreement applicable to individual disputes to facilitate their dispute settlement.Proposal to solution of the multilateral procedural problem is offered based on the dispute settlement practices.
作者 甘翠平
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》 北大核心 2014年第3期16-26,共11页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
基金 上海市085教师公派出国访学进修项目 华东政法大学校级科学研究项目(2012-2014年) 上海地方高校研究生学术新人培育项目阶段性成果
关键词 WTO争端解决 适用顺序问题 欧共体香蕉案 双边程序协议 WTO dispute settlement sequencing issue EC-bananas III bilateral sequencing agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1WT/DS27/RW/EEC, para 1.1.
  • 2WT/IXS/RW/EEC, para 1.4.
  • 3WT/DS27/RW/EEC, para 1.4.
  • 4See WTO Doc WT/DS27/43.
  • 5WT/DS27/ARB, Para 1.1.
  • 6See WT/DS27/ARB, 9 April 1999, at 3 (Para. 2. 9).
  • 7See WT/DS27/ARB, 9 April 1999. And WT/DS27/RW/EEC.
  • 8See WTO Doe WT/DS165/R, 17 July 2000, Para. 6. 124.
  • 9WT/DS108/ARB, Para 1.3.
  • 10WT/DS108/ARB, Para 1.1.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部