摘要
不少理论家认为,后现代主义正不断以游戏的方式使用着西方的传统文化资源,并将其视为解除历史深度威胁的有效符码,其结果不仅使现代主义的前卫艺术失去了惊世骇俗的力量,同时也以玩世不恭的态度否定了经典美学的崇高感。本文不完全同意这种见解,并试从跨文化立场寻找新的阐释思路。通过以中国经典的诗学传统与后现代美学原则的对话和比较,从而有理由认为,后现代主义对前卫艺术和经典美学的双重否定,只是针对西方主流文化艺术传统的反叛,而当后现代的文化钟摆游荡出西方近代理性思维的囚笼之时,它可能在无意中却接近了东方中国的某些诗学观念和美学精神。论文进一步从主体的消解。
Abstract A dialogue and comparison between the classical tradition of Chinese aesthetics and postmodern aesthetic principles lead to the following conclusion: that the negation by postmodernism of both avant-garde art and classical aesthetics is a revolt against mainstream cultural and artistic traditions in the West when postmodern culture breaks out of the prison of modern Western rational thinking, it unintentionally approaches, perhaps, certain poetic conceptions and aesthetic spirit of oriental China. The disintegration of the subject, the ambiguity of meaning and the aestheticization of daily life are topics dealt with in the paper in the development of the author's argument.
出处
《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
1996年第1期44-50,134,共8页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)