期刊文献+

边接触、边遏制——克林顿政府的对华政策剖析 被引量:2

ENGAGEMENT PLUS CONTAINMENT
原文传递
导出
摘要 边接触、边遏制——克林顿政府的对华政策剖析梁根成近一个时期以来,国内外对当前美国对华政策的性质有不同看法。有的人说克林顿政府的对华政策是一种“全面接触”政策,另一些人则认为是“全面遏制”政策,也有人断定介于这两者之间,等等。鉴于中美关系的重要性,研... AbstractThe author argues that the Clinton administration's China policy is one of engaging as well as containing China. This is determined by such factors as 'the strategy of engagement and enlargement', the rise of China, U.S. domestic politics, international politics and economic relations. The administration has to look hard among inconsistencies for a point of equilibrium in the formulation and implementation of its China policy which is obviously self-contradictory. However, as equilibrium is relative and disequilibrium absolute, Sino American relations are bound to be unstable and tortuous.
作者 梁根成
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 1996年第2期7-20,3,共15页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
  • 相关文献

同被引文献36

  • 1孙君健.克林顿总统时期美国对华政策形成的特点——以总统、国会在对华贸易最惠国待遇问题上的争论为例[J].史学月刊,2005(6):64-68. 被引量:4
  • 2张耀.反恐:审视美俄关系的另一种视角[J].国际观察,2006(1):69-76. 被引量:1
  • 3Joseph A. Laroski, Jr. , "NMEs: A Love Story, Nonmarket and Market Economy Status Under U. S. Antidumping law," Law and Policy in International Business , Vol. 30, No. 2,1999, p. 373.
  • 4Antidumping Act, supra note 1. at §§ 201-06, 19 U. S.C. §§ 160-65 (1964).
  • 5Antidumping Act, supra note 1. at §§ 201-06, 19 U. S.C.§ 205, 19 U.S.C.§164 (1964).
  • 6Section 206(a) of the Antidumping Act, supra note 1.
  • 7Joseph A. Laroski, Jr. , "NMEs : A Love Story, Nonmarket and Market Economy Status under U. S. Antidumping Law," Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1999, p. 373. J.
  • 8oseph A. Laroski, Jr. , "NMEs : A Love Story, Nonmarket and Market Economy Status under U.S. Antidumping Law," Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1999, p. 373.
  • 9"It is recognized that, in the case of imports from a country which has a complete or substantially complete monopoly of its trade and where all domestic prices are fixed by the State, special difficulties may exist in determining price comparability for the purposes of paragraph 1, and in such cases importing contrac- ting parties may find it necessary to take into account the possibiIity that a strict comparison with domestic prices in such a country may not always be appropriate. " Cited from The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, available at: https ://www. wto. org/english/docs_e/legal e/gatt47_03_e, htm, 2015.10.8 o.
  • 10Donald L. Cuneo and Charles B. Manuel, Jr. , "Roadblock to Trade: The State-Controlled Econmny Issue in Anti- dumping Law Administration," Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2,1981, p. 284.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部