期刊文献+

损失规避:得失不对称的心理效用

下载PDF
导出
摘要 损失规避(loss aversion)是一种普遍存在的社会现象,它最初由Amos Tversky和DanielKahneman在其前景理论中提出。在经济决策领域,损失规避是指在等量的损失和获益面前进行权衡、选择时,人们有着偏好规避损失而不是获得等值收益的强烈倾向。其心理学基础即为,人们会相对于某个参考点,对某件事物的获得和损失予以评估,在评估中,等量得失的心理效用是不对称的,等量价值的损失比获益的效用要大。损失规避自被提出之后,得到了广泛的讨论和应用。然而目前对于损失规避原因的解释还没有得到充分论证和探讨。
作者 王伟印
出处 《中国城市经济》 2012年第1期116-117,共2页 China Urban Economy
基金 基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(216113149)。参考文献[1]Tompkins J.A. White J.A. Bozer Y.A. Frazelle E.H. Tanchoco J.M.A.Facilities Planning[M].NJ.:John Wilsy&Sons Hoboken NJ 2003.[2]Hausman W.H. Schwarz L.B.and Graves S.C.(1976).Optimal storageassignment in automatic warehousing systems[J].Management Science 22(6) 629-638.[3]Rosenblatt M.J. Eynan A.Deriving the optimal boundaries forclass-based automatic storage/retrieval systems[J].Management Science.1989(8) 342-348.[4]李晓春.配送中心拣货作业设计与优化[D].暨南大学 2009
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1刘欢,梁竹苑,李纾.得失程数的变化:损失规避现象的新视点[J].心理学报,2009,41(12):1123-1132. 被引量:20
  • 2邹燕,郭菊娥.对期望理论的两个重要推进——损失厌恶系数λ及参考点研究[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(5):87-89. 被引量:14
  • 3William Samuelson,Richard Zeckhauser.Status quo bias in decision making[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty . 1988 (1)
  • 4Tversky A,Kahneman D.Loss aversion in riskless choice:a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal . 1991
  • 5Benartzi S,Thaler RH.Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. Quarterly Journal . 1995
  • 6Kahneman D,Knetsch JL,Thaler RH.Anomalies-The Endowment Effect,Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Econometrics . 1991
  • 7Van Dijk, Eric,and Daan Van Knippenberg.Buying and Selling Exchange Goods: Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect. Journal of Economic Psychology . 1996
  • 8Strahilevitz, Michal A,George F Loewenstein.The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects. Journal of Consumer Research . 1998
  • 9Carmon Z,Wertenbroch K,Zeelenberg M.Option Attach-ment:When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel Like Losing. Journal of Consumer Research . 2003
  • 10Dhar,Ravi,Wertenbroch Klaus.Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing . 2000

二级参考文献30

  • 1Arkes, H. R., Hirshleifer, D. A., Jiang, D., & Lim, S. S. (2007). A Cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: evidence from China, Korea, and the US. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstrac_tid=999987.
  • 2Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 3Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.
  • 4Chapman, G. B. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 47-58.
  • 5Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.
  • 6Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 60-71.
  • 7Harinck, F., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Mersmann, P. (2008). When gains loom larger than losses: reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099-1105.
  • 8Gimpel, H. (2007). Loss aversion and reference-dependent preferences in multi-attribute negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16, 303-319.
  • 9Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? The American Economic Review, 81, 635-647.
  • 10Horowitz, J. K., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 426-447.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部