期刊文献+

Influence of steric and intramolecular inductive effects on the variable trends in R-X (R=Alkyl) bond dissociation energy 被引量:4

Influence of steric and intramolecular inductive effects on the variable trends in R-X (R=Alkyl) bond dissociation energy
原文传递
导出
摘要 The question "why are the variation trends of R-X bond dissociation energy different?" is answered. The R-X bond dissociation energy (BDE) may be influenced by three main factors: the C-X intrinsic bond energy, the 1,3 geminal repulsion, and the intramolecular charge-induced dipole. In the presence of atom X, the variation trend of BDE in R-X (R= Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu) is dominated by two factors, the 1,3 geminal repulsion and the intramolecular charge-induced dipole. The former decreases the R-X BDE, and the latter either increases or decreases the R-X BDE. For the series of R-X with the R-C bond (such as R-Me, R-CH == CH2, R-C≡CH, and R-CN), the 1,3 geminal repulsion decreases the R-X BDE, and the variation trends of R-C BDE decrease from Me to t-Bu. As regards the series of R-X (such as R-H, R-BH2, and R-SiH2) in which the electronegativity of atom X is smaller than that of the carbon atom, the above two factors decrease the R-X BDE, and the variation trends of the R-X BDE decrease from Me to t-Bu. As to the series of R-X (such as R-F, R-OH, R-Cl, R-Br, R-I, and R-NH2) in which the electronegativity of atom X is larger than that of the carbon atom, the 1,3 geminal repulsion decreases the R-X BDE, while the intramolecular charge-induced dipole increases the R-X BDE. In this case, the variation trends of R-X BDE depend on the competition of the two factors. As a result, some of them (e. g., R-F, R-OH) increase from Me to t-Bu, some (e. g., R-I) decrease from Me to t-Bu, and some (e. g., R-Br) change very little. The question “why are the variation trends of R-X bond dissociation energy different?” is answered. The R-X bond dissociation energy (BDE) may be influenced by three main factors: the C-X intrinsic bond energy, the 1,3 geminal repulsion, and the intramolecular charge-induced dipole. In the presence of atom X, the variation trend of BDE in R-X (R= Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu) is dominated by two factors, the 1,3 geminal repulsion and the intramolecular charge-induced dipole. The former decreases the R-X BDE, and the latter either increases or decreases the R-X BDE. For the series of R-X with the R-C bond (such as R-Me, R-CH == CH2, R-C≡CH, and R-CN), the 1,3 geminal repulsion decreases the R-X BDE, and the variation trends of R-C BDE decrease from Me to t-Bu. As regards the series of R-X (such as R-H, R-BH2, and R-SiH2) in which the electronegativity of atom X is smaller than that of the carbon atom, the above two factors decrease the R-X BDE, and the variation trends of the R-X BDE decrease from Me to t-Bu. As to the series of R-X (such as R-F, R-OH, R-Cl, R-Br, R-I, and R-NH2) in which the electronegativity of atom X is larger than that of the carbon atom, the 1,3 geminal repulsion decreases the R-X BDE, while the intramolecular charge-induced dipole increases the R-X BDE. In this case, the variation trends of R-X BDE depend on the competition of the two factors. As a result, some of them (e. g., R-F, R-OH) increase from Me to t-Bu, some (e. g., R-I) decrease from Me to t-Bu, and some (e. g., R-Br) change very little.
出处 《Science China Chemistry》 SCIE EI CAS 2009年第7期943-951,共9页 中国科学(化学英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20772028) the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 06JJ2002) Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry and Molecular Simulation of Ministry of Education, Hunan University of Science and Technology
关键词 bond DISSOCIATION energy charge-induced DIPOLE geminal REPULSION ionic configuration bond dissociation energy charge-induced dipole geminal repulsion ionic configuration
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Cao C E,Li Z.Molecular polarizability I: Relationship to water solubility of alkanes and alcohols. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences . 1998
  • 2Pauling,L.The nature of chemical bond IV. Energy of single bonds and the relative electronegativity of atoms. Journal of the American Chemical Society . 1932
  • 3Gronert S.An alternative interpretation of the C-H bond strengths of alkanes. Journal of Organic Chemistry . 2006
  • 4Gronert S.Evidence that alkyl substitution provides little stabilization to radicals:the C-C bond test and the nonbonded interaction contradiction. Journal of Organic Chemistry . 2006
  • 5Mitoraj M,Zhu H,Michalak A,Ziegler T.1,3Geminal interactions as the possible trend setting factors for C-H and C-C bond ener-gies in alkanes.Support from a density functional theory based bond energy decomposition study. Journal of Organic Chemistry . 2006
  • 6Coote M L,Pross A,Radom L.Variable trends in R—X bond dissociation energies(R=Me,Et,i-Pr,t-Bu). Organic Letters . 2003
  • 7Matsunaga N,Rogers D W,Zavitsas A A.Pauling‘s electronegativity equation and a new corollary accurately predict bond dissociation enthalpies and enhance current understanding of the nature of the chemical bond. Journal of Organic Chemistry . 2003
  • 8Gasteiger J,Hutchingst M G.Quantification of effective polarisability.Applications to studies of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and alkylamine protonation. J Chem Soc,Perkin Trans2 . 1984
  • 9Izgorodina E I,Coote M L,Radom L.Trends in R—X bond dissociation energies(R=Me,Et,i-Pr,t-Bu;X=H,CH3,OCH3,OH,F):A surprising shortcoming of density functional theory. Journal of Physical Chemistry A . 2005
  • 10Brinck T,Lee H-N,Jonsson M.Quantum chemical studies on the thermochemistry of alkyl and peroxyl radicals. Journal of Physical Chemistry A . 1999

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部