期刊文献+

Working fluids of a low-temperature geothermally-powered Rankine cycle for combined power and heat generation system 被引量:4

Working fluids of a low-temperature geothermally-powered Rankine cycle for combined power and heat generation system
原文传递
导出
摘要 A novel combined power and heat generation system was investigated in this study. This system consists of a low-temperature geothermally-powered organic Rankine cycle (ORC) subsystem, an intermediate heat exchanger and a commercial R134a-based heat pump subsystem. The advantages of the novel combined power and heat generation system are free of using additional cooling water circling system for the power generation subsystem as well as maximizing the use of thermal energy in the low-temperature geothermal source. The main purpose is to identify suitable working fluids (wet, isentropic and dry flu-ids) which may yield high PPR (the ratio of power produced by the power generation subsystem to power consumed by the heat pump subsystem) value and QQR (the ratio of heat supplied to the user to heat produced by the geothermal source) value. Parameters under investigation were evaporating temperature, PPR value and QQR value. Results indicate that there exits an optimum evaporating temperature to maximize the PPR value and minimize the QQR value at the same time for individual fluid. And dry fluids show higher PPR values but lower QQR values. NH3 and R152a outstand among wet fluids. R134a out-stands among isentropic fluids. R236ea, R245ca, R245fa, R600 and R600a outstand among dry fluids. R236ea shows the highest PPR value among the recommended fluids. A novel combined power and heat generation system was investigated in this study. This system consists of a low-temperature geothermally-powered organic Rankine cycle (ORC) subsystem, an intermediate heat exchanger and a commercial R134a-based heat pump subsystem. The advantages of the novel combined power and heat generation system are free of using additional cooling water circling system for the power generation subsystem as well as maximizing the use of thermal energy in the low-temperature geothermal source. The main purpose is to identify suitable working fluids (wet, isentropic and dry flu-ids) which may yield high PPR (the ratio of power produced by the power generation subsystem to power consumed by the heat pump subsystem) value and QQR (the ratio of heat supplied to the user to heat produced by the geothermal source) value. Parameters under investigation were evaporating temperature, PPR value and QQR value. Results indicate that there exits an optimum evaporating temperature to maximize the PPR value and minimize the QQR value at the same time for individual fluid. And dry fluids show higher PPR values but lower QQR values. NH3 and R152a outstand among wet fluids. R134a out-stands among isentropic fluids. R236ea, R245ca, R245fa, R600 and R600a outstand among dry fluids. R236ea shows the highest PPR value among the recommended fluids.
出处 《Science China(Technological Sciences)》 SCIE EI CAS 2010年第11期3072-3078,共7页 中国科学(技术科学英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No 50976079)
关键词 organic Rankine cycle(ORC) low-temperature geothermal working fluids power generation heat production heat pump organic Rankine cycle (ORC) low-temperature geothermal working fluids power generation heat production heat pump
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1J M Calm and D A Didion.Trade-offs in refrigerant selections-past,present,and future.Refrigerants for the 21st century (proceedings of the ASHRAE/NIST Conference,Gaithersburg,MD,October 1997).ASHRAE,Atlanta,GA,USA,1997.International Journal of Refrigeration (IJR),June 1998,21(4):308-321.
  • 2J M Calm.Property,safety,and environmental data for alternative refrigerants.Proceedings of the Earth Technologies Forum (Washington,DC,USA).Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy,Arlington,VA,USA,October 1998:192-205.
  • 3J M Calm and G C Hourahan.Physical,safety,and environmental data for refrigerants.Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering,August 1999,71(8):27-33.
  • 4J M Calm and G C Hourahan.Refrigerant data summary.Engineered Systems,November 2001,18(11):74-88.
  • 5Designation and safety classification of refrigerants.ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34-2004,ASHRAE,Atlanta,GA,USA,2004,and both published and pending addenda thereto,2004-2006.
  • 6R D Loss for the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances.Atomic weights of the elements 2001(IUPAC Technical Report).Pure and Applied Chemistry,August 2003,75(8):1107-1122; and private communications on the 2005 updates in press.
  • 7J M Calm and P A Domanski.R-22 replacement status.ASHRAE Journal,August 2004,46(8):29-39; Erratum,October 2004,46(10):8.
  • 8World Meteorological Organization (WMO).Scientific assessment of ozone depletion:2006.WMO,Geneva,Switzerland,in press with expected publication in March 2007.
  • 9Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP).Safe-guarding the ozone layer and the global climate system.Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons,WMO,Geneva,Switzerland,and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Ozone Secretariat,Nairobi,Kenya,2005.
  • 10Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).Climate Change 2001:The scientific basis-contribution of working group I to the IPCC third assessment report.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,2001.

共引文献36

同被引文献76

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部