2种保留灌肠法治疗婴幼儿腹泻的疗效比较

To Compared the Effect of Two Kinds of Retention Enema Treatment of Infantile Diarrhea

目的探讨加深插入保留灌肠法对婴幼儿腹泻治疗的效果。方法将300例婴幼儿腹泻患儿随机分为观察组和对照组,各150例,观察组采用加深插入保留灌肠法,对照组采用传统保留灌肠法,观察2组患儿灌肠后首次大便排出时间及临床疗效。结果观察组与对照组在大便排出时间及临床疗效2方面比较均有显著性差异(p<0.01)。结论加深插入保留灌肠法对治疗婴幼儿腹泻疗效明显。

Objective:To explore the effect of deeper insertion enema retention on infantile diarrhea.Methods:300 infants and young children with diarrhea were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 150 cases each,the observation group was adopted deeper insertion enema retention,while the control group was adopted the traditional kind of enema retention.To observe the time of the first stool after enema and the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Results:There was significant difference about the time of the first stool after enema and the clinical efficacy between the two groups(p<0.01).Conclusion:The method of deeper insertion retention enema can enhance the clinical efficacy of infantile diarrhea obviously.