期刊文献+

唐家山堰塞体溃口宽度的模拟计算 被引量:4

Calculation of Breach Width of Tangjiashan Quake Lake
下载PDF
导出
摘要 唐家山堰塞湖的溃决具有以下特点:上下双层的土体结构,水压差大,渗流严重,导流渠弯曲,颗粒不均匀,物质组成松散及坝体稳定性差等.为了寻找合适的模型用于模拟唐家山堰塞湖溃口口门的发展,本文对比分析了河岸展宽模型(Osman公式)及土石坝溃决模型(Froehlich方法和垦务局模型)的计算结果与实测溃口资料.结果表明,Osman公式的计算溃口宽与土体启动切应力的取值关系较大,而土体切应力的计算方法各异;而Froehlich方法计算的口门宽度在溃口发生的始末阶段较为吻合,而在洪峰增长过程中误差较大,垦务局方法则在溃口发展后期的计算误差较大.分析认为,两种方法在模拟计算唐家山堰塞体的溃口宽度时均不是很理想,模拟唐家山坝体的溃口尚需要更为深入的研究,以能反映其溃口的特点. The breach of Tangjiashan Quake Lake is characterized with double-frame soil,high water pressure,serious seepage,loose materials with un-uniform sediment and unstable dam.In order to simulate the breach of Tangjiashan Quake Lake,two different ways were used to simulate the breach width based on the measured data,riverbank widening method(Osman method) and earthen dam break method(models of Froehlich and Bureau of Reclamation).Ananlysis revealed that,reach width calculated by Osman method depended on the shear stress of soil,which was difficult to determine.The result by Froehlich method agreeed well with the measured at the begining and end of the breaching process,with much more deviation when simulating the width during discharge increasing period.And the width by method of Bureau of Reclamation deviated more in the later stage.The analysis showed that,the simulation of break width of Tangjiashan Quake Lake needs more specific method,which one can reflect the characteristics of breach in Tangjiashan Quake Lake.
出处 《应用基础与工程科学学报》 EI CSCD 2009年第S1期10-17,共8页 Journal of Basic Science and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会创新群体研究基金项目(50221903)
关键词 唐家山堰塞湖 溃口模拟 河岸展宽模型 土石坝溃决模型 Tangjiashan Quake Lake breach simulation riverbank widening method breaching model of earth dam
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

共引文献78

同被引文献72

  • 1朱勇辉,范北林,卢金友,张细兵,杨文俊,渠庚.唐家山堰塞湖溃坝洪水分析及泄流冲刷模拟[J].人民长江,2008,39(22):79-82. 被引量:17
  • 2金中武,卢金友,姚仕明.长江上游推移质泥沙输沙率公式的检验[J].水利学报,2009,39(11):1299-1306. 被引量:5
  • 3张尚弘,王兴奎,易雨君,周鹏程.防洪数字仿真平台总体框架及关键技术研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2009,17(S1):49-57. 被引量:8
  • 4潘存鸿.三角形网格下求解二维浅水方程的和谐Godunov格式[J].水科学进展,2007,18(2):204-209. 被引量:40
  • 5Kirkpatriek, W G. Evaluation guidelines for spillway adequacy [ C ]//The Evaluation of Dam Safety, Engineering Foundation Con- ference, Pacific Grove, California, ASCE, 1977 : 395 - 414.
  • 6Hagen V K. Re - evaluation of design floods and dam safety [ C ]// Proceedings 14th Congress of International Commission on Large Dams, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1952.
  • 7MacDonald T C, J Langridge - Monopolis. Breaching characteristics of dam failures [ J ]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1984,110 (5) :567 -586.
  • 8Costa J E, Schuster R L. The formation and failure of natural dams [J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1988, (100):1054 - 1068.
  • 9Evans S G. The maximum discharge of outburst floods caused by the breaching of man-made and natural dams[ J]. Canadian Geotechni- cal Journal, 1986, 23 : 1154 - 1163.
  • 10Froehlich, D C. Embankment dam breach parameters [ C ] //Pro- ceedings of the 1987 ASCE National Conference on Hydraulic Engi- neering, Williamsburg, Virginia, 1987:570-575.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部