实验博弈研究发展综述
摘要
实验博弈可以为博弈理论研究提供进一步拓展的空间。在博弈论理论发展的同时,实验博弈中的典型论题:最后通牒、讨价还价、拍卖、古诺寡头实验都取得了显著的进展。在此基础上,本文总结了近年来实验博弈的研究热点和前沿,并对实验博弈的进一步发展提供了思路。
出处
《消费导刊》
2009年第23期208-209,共2页
参考文献17
-
1高鸿桢,王家辉.实验博弈论研究的若干进展[J].厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2006,56(3):80-84. 被引量：6
-
2王若平.实验博弈论的新发展[J].江苏商论,2004(10):117-119. 被引量：1
-
3Miguel A. Fonseca,Wieland Müller,Hans-Theo Normann.Endogenous timing in duopoly: experimental evidence[J]. International Journal of Game Theory . 2006 (3)
-
4Hessel Oosterbeek,Joep Sonnemans,Susan van Velzen.The need for marriage contracts: An experimental study[J]. Population Economics . 2003 (3)
-
5Paul Pezanis-Christou.On the impact of low-balling: Experimental results in asymmetric auctions[J]. International Journal of Game Theory . 2002 (1)
-
6Steffen Huck,Hans-Theo Normann,J?rg Oechssler.Stability of the Cournot process – experimental evidence[J]. International Journal of Game Theory . 2002 (1)
-
7James L. Smith,Dan Levin.Entry coordination in auctions and social welfare: An experimental investigation[J]. International Journal of Game Theory . 2002 (3)
-
8S. Berninghaus,W. Güth,R. Lechler,H.-J. Ramser.Decentralized versus collective bargaining – An experimental study[J]. International Journal of Game Theory . 2002 (3)
-
9John Duffy,Nick Feltovich.Does observation of others affect learning in strategic environments? An experimental study[J]. International Journal of Game Theory . 1999 (1)
-
10Büchner.Susanne,González.Luis G,Güth.Werner,Levati.M.Vittoria.Incentive contracts versus trust in three-person ultimatum games:an experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy . 2004
二级参考文献11
-
1C. Camerer, "Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction," PrincetonUniv. Press, Princeton, NJ,2002.
-
2Camerer, Progress in behavioral game theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 ( 1997 ), 167-188.
-
3[美]迪克西特,等.策略思维[M].王尔山译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
-
4JOHN VAN HUYCK,RAYMOND BATTALIO,AND RICHARD BELL.Tacit coordination games,strategic uncertainty,and coordination failure[J].American Economic Review,80 (1990).
-
5FREDERICK RANKIN,JOHN VAN HUYCK,AND RAYMOND BATTALIO.Strategic similarity and emergent conventions:evidence from similar stag hunt games[J].Games and Economic Behavior,(2002),315-337.
-
6ELENA KATOK,MARTINSEFTON,AND ABDUL LAH YAVAS,Implementation by iterative dominance and backward induction:An experimental comparison[J].Journal of Economics Theory,(2002),89-104.
-
7ERIC JOHNSON,COLIN CAMERER,SANKAR SEN,AND TALIA RYMON,Detecting failures of backward induction:Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining[J].Journal of Economics Theory,(2002),16-47.
-
8KEN BINMORE,JOHN MCCARTHY,GIOVANNI PONTI,LARRY SAMUELSON,ABD AVNER SHAKED,A backward induction experiment[J].Journal of Economics Theory,(2002),137-188.
-
9URI GNEEZY,WERNER GUTH.On competing reward standards-an experimental study of ultimatum bargaining[J].Journal of Socio-Economics,31 (2003),599-607.
-
10ALAN G.SANFEY ET AL.The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game[J].SCIENCE,VOL300 (13),JUNE 2003.
共引文献5
-
1方志耕,刘思峰,施红星,徐正栋.破解“蜈蚣博弈”悖论:“灰数规整”顺推归纳法研究[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(1):180-186. 被引量：5
-
2黄春松.有限理性下的博弈均衡分析[J].漳州师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）,2008,22(4):41-44.
-
3李宝娣,唐邵玲.关于讨价还价实验的讨论[J].商业经济,2009(6):13-14.
-
4刘晓丽.博弈论中的理性困惑及出路——基于选数博弈和最后通牒博弈的实验研究[J].兰州学刊,2012(9):23-26.
-
5官华平.《博弈论》课堂实验教学探析[J].统计与管理,2015,0(6):175-176. 被引量：1
-
1丁一.反思与探究:经济现象与博弈分析[J].管理学刊,2015,28(1):28-31. 被引量：2
-
2王维祥,李永森.上市公司清欠大限将至[J].中国经济信息,2006(24):52-53.
-
3王若颖,陈宏民.双头垄断市场重复博弈中的对策行为:实验研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1998,15(11):23-28. 被引量：5
-
4陈启令.莫因财务小事坏了资金大局[J].销售与市场,2005(07X):20-22.
-
5刘德海.理性概念的内涵及其在博弈论学科体系中的地位[J].东北财经大学学报,2012,13(5):10-15. 被引量：1
-
6尹锋,于宁.黄光裕最后通牒之后[J].新世纪周刊,2010(37):64-65.
-
7孙赫.双寡头创新市场结构中的知识产权保护的经济效应分析[J].商场现代化,2008(2):310-311. 被引量：3
-
8夏冰.杨致远和微软讨价还价[J].中国计算机用户,2008(13):18-18.
-
9聚焦对“官煤勾结”的最后通牒[J].工商行政管理,2005,0(19):52-52.
-
10杜军,刘解龙.实验博弈理论研究进展[J].经济学动态,2006(11):95-99.
