期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰药物经济学研究综述 被引量:8

艾司西酞普兰药物经济学研究综述
原文传递
导出
摘要 艾司西酞普兰(Escitaloprara)是一种相对较新的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂。来自国外的药物经济学研究表明,艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症和广泛性焦虑具有明显的经济性。研究者通过对国外已有研究文献进行分析发现,与西酞普兰(citalopram)、氟西汀(Fluoxetine)、帕罗西汀(Paroxetine)、帕罗西汀CR(Paroxetine CR)、盐酸舍曲林(Sertraline)、盐酸度洛西汀(Duloxetine)、文拉法辛(Venlafaxine)和文拉法辛XR(Venlafaxine XR)相比,艾司西酞普兰的不良事件发生率和平均治愈一例患者的成本显著较低,而临床产出显著优于其他产品。同时,艾司西酞普兰在提高患者生存质量和预防复发方面也显著优于其他产品。已有药物经济学研究的数据显示,与其他竞争者相比,艾司西酞普兰更具有成本-效果和成本-效用优势。 Escitalopram is a new highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Analyses on the basis of available pharmacoeconomic investigations from oversea countries suggest that Escitalopram is an effective antidepressant in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD).Modelled pharmacoeconomic analyses found that Escitalopram,with the lowest ADR rate of the SRIs,had the lowest cost per successfully treated patient and best clinical outcomes when compared with citalopram, fluoxetine,paroxetine,paroxetine CR,sertraline,duloxetine,venlafaxine and venlafaxine XR. The difference reached statistical significance.Moreover,escitalopram treatment improves QoL of patients with GAD or MDD greatly and is more effective than placebo in the prevention of relapse.Overall,clinical and pharmacoeconomic datas prove that escitalopram has a cost- effectiveness and cost-utility advantage over comparators.
出处 《中国药物经济学》 2008年第2期6-20,共15页 China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词 药物经济学 艾司西酞普兰 成本-效果 成本-效用 pharmacoeconomics Escitalopram cost-effectiveness cost-utility
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Werner Kulp,J.-M. Graf Schulenburg,Wolfgang Greiner.Cost-effectiveness of outpatient treatment in depressive patients with escitalopram in Germany[J]. The European Journal of Health Economics . 2005 (4)
  • 2C. Fran?ois,M. Toumi,A.-M. Aakhus,K. Hansen.A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of escitalopram, a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor[J]. The European Journal of Health Economics . 2003 (1)
  • 3C. Bruce Baker,Scott W. Woods.Cost of Treatment Failure for Major Depression: Direct Costs of Continued Treatment[J]. Administration and Policy in Mental Health . 2001 (4)
  • 4Katherine F Croom,and Greg L Escitalopram.A Pharmacoeconomic Review of its Use in Depression. Pharmacoeconomics . 2003
  • 5Barbara Barrett,Sarah Byford,Martin Knapp.Evidence of cost- effective treatments for depression:a systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders . 2005
  • 6The Economic Burden of Depression in the United States:How Did it Change Between 1990 and 2000?. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry . 2003
  • 7Economic Burden of Depression in China is Second Highest Worldwide:Annual Costs at Least RMB30 Billion (US(?)3.5 Billion). PR Newswire . 2004
  • 8Patrick W Sullivan,Robert Valuck,Joseph Saseen,and Holly M MacFall.A Comparison of the Direct Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Associated Adverse Drug Reactions. CNS Drugs . 2004
  • 9Tine R Jorgensen,Nicolas Despiegel,Clement Francois.Escitalopram treatment improves quality of life of generalised anxiety disorder patients measured by SF-36. The 12th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) . 2005
  • 10Jos‘e-Luis Fernandez,,Stuart Montgomery,and Cl‘ement Francois.Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of Escitalopram versus Venlafaxine XR in Major Depressive Disorder. Pharmacoeconomics . 2005

同被引文献67

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部