期刊文献+

两种钛种植体与骨结合界面的组织学研究 被引量:9

The Morphological Study of Bone-implant Interfaces in vivo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对两种表面形态不同的钛种植体在不同种植时期骨结合界面情况进行研究。方法 在恒河猴下颌磨牙区分期分别植入CDIC和ITI_TPS钛种植体 ,采用同体对照的方法 ,对两种种植体与骨结合界面情况进行组织学观察。结果 口腔检查未见种植体松动及周围组织明显炎症表现。各期种植体骨界面X线影像均未见明显透射暗影 ,仅种植 1个月的CDIC种植体颈部见少量角形吸收。光镜和扫描电镜观察见种植 1个月后两种种植体骨界面有少量骨形成 ;1~ 3个月ITI_TPS种植体界面骨形成较明显 ,成骨量统计分析 ,差异有显著性 ;种植后 1年 ,两者未见明显差别。结论 无载荷条件下 ,种植体植入后 1~ 3个月内 ,ITI_TPS种植体表面骨结合形成优于CDIC种植体。随植入时间的增加 ,两种种植体均形成良好的骨性结合界面。 Objective To evaluate the bone-implant interfaces of two kinds of implants with different surfaces in different time in vivo.Methods CDIC and ITI-TPS solid-screw cylinder pure titanium implants were selected and implanted in the regions of posterior molars of rhesus monkeys. 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 1 year after surgery, the bone-implant interfaces were evaluated respectively through oral examination, X-ray inspection, light microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation.Results None of the implants was loose. Soft tissue around implants appeared no inflammation. There were no apparent transparent shadow around the implants interfaces in X-ray photos except little angle-shaped absorption was showed in neck region of CDIC implants of one-month. New bone was observed around implants of one-month through light microscope and SEM. More bone growing around ITI implants were seen than that around CDIC implants except the interfaces of one-year.Conclusion The osseointegration of ITI implants are better than that of CDIC implants during three months after implanting without loading, The bone formation at the interfaces of ITI and CDIC implants has no significant difference after one year without loading.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期242-245,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 云南省教育厅基金资助项目 (971 2 1 1 7)
关键词 骨整合 形态学 钛种植体 磨片 osseointegration morphology titanium implants grinding slice
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]sergo V, Sbalzero O, David RC, Mechanical and chemical consequences of the residual stresses in plasma sprayed hydroxyaptite coatings[J]. Biom-aterials, 1997, 18(6):477-482.
  • 2宋光保,薛淼,宁丽.TM种植体的表面特征与骨整合[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2000,9(3):134-137. 被引量:15
  • 3[3]Han CH. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,1998,9(1):1-10.
  • 4[4]Perry R. Paul Jonhnson Soheila Dadgostari, Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit[J]. Clin Oral Impants Res, 2001,12(2) :350-359.
  • 5[5]Branemark PI. Tissue Intergrated Protheses: Osseointergration in Clinical Dentaistry[M]. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 1985:99-116.
  • 6[6]Geraledo G, Lugero M, Falco Caparbo V, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of titanium implants in osteoporotic rabbits [J]. Implant Dent,2000, 9(4) :303-309.
  • 7[7]Craig RG, Le Geres RZ. Early events associated with periodontal conJ Biomed Mater Res, 1999,47(4):585-594.
  • 8[8]Baier RE, Meyer AE. Implant surface preparation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998,13 ( 1 ): 9-20.
  • 9刘果生.CDIC^R种植体、种植器械的功能特点及临床应用[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2000,5(3):145-148. 被引量:3
  • 10[10]Buser SS. Oral implantology: Basic, ITI Hollow Cylinder System[M].Thieme Medical Publishers. Inc. New York, 1996,83: 368-369.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Gross KA, Berndt CC, Goldschlag DD, et al. In vitro changes of hydroxyapatite coatings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:509.
  • 2Steflik DE, Corpe SC, Lake FT, et al. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants;TEM and HVEM analyses .Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1997,12: 443.
  • 3Wataha JC, Revies; Materials for endosseous dental implants. J Dent Res,1996,23;79.
  • 4Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, et al. Bone response to surface- mod-ified titanium implants; studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials,1996,17; 605.
  • 5Jianguo L, Haihong Liao, Bahaman Fartash. Surface dimpled commercially pure titanium implant and bone ingrowth, Bionaterials. 1997,18:691.
  • 6Yong - shun Chang, Masanori Oka, Masanori Kobayashi. Significance of interstitial bone ingrowth under load - bearing conditions; a comparison between solid and porous implant materials, Biomaterials. 1996; 17:114.
  • 7Sergo V, Sbaizero O, David RC, Mechanical and chemical consequences of the residual stresses in plasma sprayed hydroxyaptite coatings, Biomaterials.1997,18:477.
  • 8Henry PT. Implant hardware- science or commodity development? J Dent Res, 1995,74: 301.
  • 9Leadley SR, Davies MC, Ribeiro CC, Investigation of the dissolution of the bioceramic hydroxyapatite in the presence of titanium ionsusing to FSIMSand XPS, Biomaterials, 1997,18: 311.
  • 10Piattelli A, Piattelli M, Scarona A, Simultaneous demonstration of alkaline and acid phosphatase activity in bone, at bone - implant interfaces and at the epiphyseal growth plate in plastic- embedded undemineralized tissues,Biomaterials. 1997; 18: 545.

共引文献15

同被引文献155

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部